The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Wednesday, November 2, 2022

Occupy The Public With Irrelevancy 11 02 2022

 Occupy The Public With Irrelevancy   11 02 2022

So a great media statistic might be how many hours the media spends their time on certain events as a percentage of total media time "spent?"

For example, how much of Donald Trumps Presidency was spent with Stormy Daniels in the media time?

Then you could also get into sub statistics.  Like how much time a President spent not answering questions?  But you can't get a good stat on that because he barred the Reporters that asked the best ones?

And to me it was always the current Republican Party  (past ~50 years) that wants to take away your rights?  And it looks like they figured out a way to get the Democratic Party to do that for them?

So how many mass shooters were Republicans?  Or had Trump logo items?  That whittles away at the Second Amendment doesn't it!  And I would really like to know the DNA country origin of every mass shooter.  I bet there is an identifiable pattern there.

So we suffer through the years under Republican Leadership, is the way that I see it.

Whether is was chain smoker speaker of the house wanting to shut down the Government with health care for all?

You know what it is like?  Having a sh1t kid in the classroom.

So what is that pie that shows the percentages of how the Republicans "Worked" while in office?

Do you know what I mean?  What percentage of the time did the media spend on every thing that they did to take your focus away from your rights as a United States Citizen?

So for a long time I thought television programs were just bad for you.  Filling your mind with junk.  But I bet it we were to see the statistics on Republican outbursts it would be much worse.

"A woman should be forced to keep a pregnancy, even in the case of rape or incest?"  Look at the gestalt of that and ask yourself, "What foreign initiative is that?"  

++++++"

Okay equal time.  I remember thinking about Putin years ago. And what the ultimate direction of his commentary was.  And at that time, miraculously Hillary Clinton came on television and seemed to refute that idea?  Saying Russia was a thriving Democracy?  Did she say skyscrapers?  Etc...  How wrong was she about that?  I think she was absolutely wrong about it.  And I ask myself why?  Or how could she be so wrong about it?  And then you ask yourself, what is motivating someone to be so wrong about something?  Isn't that a terrible place to be in?  To have to ask yourself that about someone?  She is so wrong she must be motivated to be deceptive?  And then you look at all the Republican junk, and ask yourself the same thing.

And then you say to yourself, if you hired someone for a job and all they did was act like that all day long (like all of the above) your business would tank!

And then you ask yourself where is Donald Trump getting all the money to launch lawsuits from and counterlawsuits and legal defenses.  And you realize it comes from contributions.  And then you ask yourself, isn't that the framework of a "Confederacy?"  And don't act like it is a term that only applies to the Civil War.  I can hear that junk mind response already.

Oh, by the way, Joe Biden, you want to royally piss off the Republicans you ought to hire me!

And then Politicians complain that the public can't learn.  Benchmarks aren't being made.  And don't you ask yourself, perhaps it has to do with leadership that doesn't belong in leadership?

And have you ever seen an instance of that in your life?  Leadership that doesn't belong in leadership?

Off topic?  And there was a joke someone read to me about a teacher who said that if you can't teach without humiliating then you can't teach.  Rings very true to me.

Is there anyone on television that I value the opinion of? No.  And how come sometimes they can start off good on a topic but then go into an odd tangent with regard to the topic?  As if somehow when confronting the topic at that point in time their brain melted, went around the topic and came back talking from there? Completely missing the relevant points?  And you sit there watching like you are at a bad circus where the clown drops all the plates spinning on the sticks on the floor and they crack.

And you ask yourself, "Who does this appeal to?"  What kind of baked brain gets the ....is there a cadre of constituents that laughs it up when that happens like they have been sucking in helium balloons?

*****'

And Biden says he wants to go after Big Oil.  But Biden won't release the records regarding the Kennedy Assassination?  The youngest President ever.  Irish. And it is a little known fact that four oil company executives came to see him and made a veiled threat to him before he was assassinated.   I mean release the full context of those records and you can come down on the oil companies a lot harder and firmer?  Little nuances here and there from what we already know and read.

And why is it we can have glaring facts that should lead to firm convictions but somehow there are machinations to downplay the importance of such things?  Again, maybe you are of the mentality that that is how money is made and maintained, so you like that?

Kennedy said beautiful and highly relevant things in his speeches with regard to our country, having a goal of longevity of our Democracy.

And any and all good things Biden is doing are obscured by the media frenzy?  It is like they sit at a table and try and find the relevancy of 3 or 4 or 5 people who locked themselves in a private closet?

© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy

No comments:

Post a Comment