Possession Does not Deem Intent 11 03 2022
~W/R to firearm ownership.
The Second Amendment makes that pretty clear in the case of firearm ownership.
And that is how it should be legally construed.
Why do we have that Second Amendment? Because without it we would not be a free nation.
And what about Assault Rifles? They are known as AR-15 variants and others.
But why call them Assault Rifles?
They first appeared in Vietnam and were used there. So to call it an Assault Rifle really implies that we used them to assault Vietnam? That isn't the case is it. They were used there to prevent the spread of communism.
But what about the Thompson Submachine gun that the AR-15 was a succession to? To call that an Assault Rifle really means that it was wrong to use them to enforce the Constitution? That enforcing the Constitution really amounted to an assault on the America? It wasn't like that. In that time period. That amendment I am alluding to (18th) was voted in because it benefitted the United States.
Now I can understand that if you have a pile of drugs 4 feet high that you have the intent to distribute. All well and good. But in terms of firearm ownership I believe that the Second Amendment is very clear. You can't deem that intent of ownership to be anything other than protecting yourself!! And if you want to know the reasons read the Declaration of Independence.
And we celebrate that every Fourth of July. And the Founding Fathers would indeed want you to have the latest, greatest and most capable, in defense of Freedom!
If someone owns a Chainsaw do you deem them to be a murderer that uses a chainsaw? Or do you deem them someone who believes they can use a powertool safely. And that they value both that skill and responsibility level as a man! Yeah, I said it, man!
How about a butcher knife they bought for a dollar? Do you deem them to be Jack the Ripper because they bought it or do they use it every night to cook with.
So what do you deem somebody to be? Deem somebody to be dangerous because they have a gallon of gasoline they bought for their lawn mower?
Do you see where this leads to? You can't do anything because someone deems you to be less than a man? And that right there is an implied tenet of Communism. You could be the best singer in the world and I someone pre-deems you not to be that you are not going to be that. You can only do what you can be deemed by that power to do. Again, less than the standard of man.
And ask yourself whose eyes you see as being the type of person that needs to deem what you do in life? Is it a male or a female? What type or subtype?
Again,
“You can't own a hammer because I deemed you to be a dangerous person.”
“Why?”
“Just because you want to have one.”
It really amounts to a subversive condemnation of human freedom.
Again, whose eyes is it looking through? Those born inept.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Ps. And what does having a ban on firearms on the ballot amount to if not complete defamation of the United States and treason?
And the media will never touch the real issue about what Communist ideological countries have against Freedom! Never!
No comments:
Post a Comment