On The Supreme Court 02 07 2019
Let's say that a Supreme Court Justice has a brain injury... I don't know, something like encephalitis or cancer.
Should they be allowed to be on the Supreme Court and adjudicating on national issues? I say NO!
Now lets say that a Supreme Court Justice has Alcoholism?
Let's say that a Supreme Court Justice has a brain injury... I don't know, something like encephalitis or cancer.
Should they be allowed to be on the Supreme Court and adjudicating on national issues? I say NO!
Now lets say that a Supreme Court Justice has Alcoholism?
Should they be allowed to be on the Supreme Court and adjudicating on national issues? The answer is still the same! I say NO!
But lets break that issue down to voting, just general voting. I don't believe any of the above are qualified electorates, meaning capable of casting a fair and honest vote.
Now step back and analyze that through history. Because it has been allowed to happen in our nation how many of our problems can be attributed to it?
You know what it is like? All the College Professors in the world could run the data and analysis on all the issues that I have brought up. Why not? Because they too likely didn't belong where they got to.
© 2019 Thomas Murphy
And sure we did have some great men who were President and drank, but wouldn't it be a lot better if throughout our history that was absent?
Now lets look at the issue of women on the Supreme Court. Alcohol affects women more strongly than it does men. But oops that is a chauvinist hate speech statement says the English American woman with a house full of kitty cats.
Now lets look at the issue of women on the Supreme Court. Alcohol affects women more strongly than it does men. But oops that is a chauvinist hate speech statement says the English American woman with a house full of kitty cats.
No comments:
Post a Comment