Bar Ownership in Wisconsin 04 16 2013
The issue of whether public sector employees should still have to live in the cities that they serve has come up in the spotlight.
But here is a better issue.
The other day I was driving down Fonduac Avenue in Milwaukee. I saw a bar and liquor store at least every other block. I saw litter strewn all over the street. What do I know about bar owners? They often do not live in the same neighborhoods that their bars are in and they often come down once a day just to collect the money. What else do I know about them? Bouncers often deal drugs for the bartenders!
Maybe the issue that should be before the public eye is, "Should Bar Owners be required to live in the communities their bars are in?" (Same goes for liquor stores!)
Here is one that will trip your mind, "Do bar owners bear a responsibility to the communities their bars are in?" Have you ever heard of a bar owner contributing to a charity that helps alcoholics? Have ever heard of a bar owner starting a work skills program for those who ruined their life's at his bar?
That Bar owner should get out on the street and clean up all the trash halfway to the next bar or liquor store in every direction.
Empirical evidence will tell you that alcohol should be banned per the Constitution once and for all because it creates a mal-developed satanic race. People who are substance abusers become locked at the mental age of when they started to use them. And you have no idea what happens to babies conceived under the influence of them. But I will give you a clue- they don't create clean communities.
The factories went up and the bars and then the Unions. And now there are no factories nor any viable work force. But they don't care they all want to grow up to be professional athletes, likely on steroids and with a criminal record.
Would the son of the Blue Collar worker have faired a lot better if their were not those corner taverns? If they have not faired good with them is that evidence enough that they would have without them? To me that is just plain common sense, it isn't even a point that can be argued against. To argue against that would be like the Republican arguing that woman that are raped cannot abort that child. Most people with common sense can't figure out what you are doing in a high paying job.
Those children, conceived of substance users, are indeed denied the opportunity or rights that everyone else has because their brain development was stalled. We know that! It has been proven by science! You can't argue against that. Their rights were limited because of development. You and I didn't do that to them, their own parents did! And what happened because of that? Everyone of us has suffered as we are forced to make the rules different for them so that they too can presume to be successful. And it is just this type of miserable person that wants to drag everyone of us down to its level. It is just that type of person that wants to prevent us from creating a drug free environment where the developmentally stalled are not created. They want to get you hooked on all that stuff so that you are leveled down to them and then below them!!!!
Off topic. I had a friend in High School. His father was an Oil Co salesman. Everyone else teased him and called him "useless." But I got along with him most of the time. But with all that oil company money what did his father do every day upon retirement? He was passed out on the side of the bed with a bottle of Vodka in his hand and his butt up in the air. He died of a stroke. Enough of that! The oil Companies should be nationalized and the bottle taken away from the mal developed wealth class. That is what you do with that money? Enough!!!! Enough polluted oceans, land air and dead heads! I grew up in Whitefish Bay and have lived here nearly all my life, in retrospect, most of the people here fit the archetype of "useless."
Copyright 2013 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 04 16 2013 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
The issue of whether public sector employees should still have to live in the cities that they serve has come up in the spotlight.
But here is a better issue.
The other day I was driving down Fonduac Avenue in Milwaukee. I saw a bar and liquor store at least every other block. I saw litter strewn all over the street. What do I know about bar owners? They often do not live in the same neighborhoods that their bars are in and they often come down once a day just to collect the money. What else do I know about them? Bouncers often deal drugs for the bartenders!
Maybe the issue that should be before the public eye is, "Should Bar Owners be required to live in the communities their bars are in?" (Same goes for liquor stores!)
Here is one that will trip your mind, "Do bar owners bear a responsibility to the communities their bars are in?" Have you ever heard of a bar owner contributing to a charity that helps alcoholics? Have ever heard of a bar owner starting a work skills program for those who ruined their life's at his bar?
That Bar owner should get out on the street and clean up all the trash halfway to the next bar or liquor store in every direction.
Empirical evidence will tell you that alcohol should be banned per the Constitution once and for all because it creates a mal-developed satanic race. People who are substance abusers become locked at the mental age of when they started to use them. And you have no idea what happens to babies conceived under the influence of them. But I will give you a clue- they don't create clean communities.
The factories went up and the bars and then the Unions. And now there are no factories nor any viable work force. But they don't care they all want to grow up to be professional athletes, likely on steroids and with a criminal record.
Would the son of the Blue Collar worker have faired a lot better if their were not those corner taverns? If they have not faired good with them is that evidence enough that they would have without them? To me that is just plain common sense, it isn't even a point that can be argued against. To argue against that would be like the Republican arguing that woman that are raped cannot abort that child. Most people with common sense can't figure out what you are doing in a high paying job.
Those children, conceived of substance users, are indeed denied the opportunity or rights that everyone else has because their brain development was stalled. We know that! It has been proven by science! You can't argue against that. Their rights were limited because of development. You and I didn't do that to them, their own parents did! And what happened because of that? Everyone of us has suffered as we are forced to make the rules different for them so that they too can presume to be successful. And it is just this type of miserable person that wants to drag everyone of us down to its level. It is just that type of person that wants to prevent us from creating a drug free environment where the developmentally stalled are not created. They want to get you hooked on all that stuff so that you are leveled down to them and then below them!!!!
Off topic. I had a friend in High School. His father was an Oil Co salesman. Everyone else teased him and called him "useless." But I got along with him most of the time. But with all that oil company money what did his father do every day upon retirement? He was passed out on the side of the bed with a bottle of Vodka in his hand and his butt up in the air. He died of a stroke. Enough of that! The oil Companies should be nationalized and the bottle taken away from the mal developed wealth class. That is what you do with that money? Enough!!!! Enough polluted oceans, land air and dead heads! I grew up in Whitefish Bay and have lived here nearly all my life, in retrospect, most of the people here fit the archetype of "useless."
Copyright 2013 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 04 16 2013 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment