The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Radioactive Judgement 04 17 2013

Hiroshima and Nagasaki  and Radioactive Judgement 04 17 2013

As we are continually reminded that the Japanese Nuclear Power plant is still leaking radioactive waste into the Ocean I have to wonder...The U.S. bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  How many people in Japan suffered from the after effects of that radiation.  After effects being trace evidence of radioactivity in the environment and any inherited gene mutations or mal-developments related to it.

What is radiation?  It can be loosely defined for the purpose of this article to be any element that emits energy on the electromagnetic spectrum and exposure to related or similar sources of radiation. So if indeed a person is exposed to it and it becomes part of their body, can it interfere with the electrical synapses in their brains?  Can people exposed to radiation poisoning make poor decisions because their brains have a radioactive element present that is disrupting the electrical thought processes of the brain?

Which gets me to the next question.  Is it possible that the workers who built that nuclear plant or worked their were exposed to a small amount of radiation that contributed to the accident?

So the water table that people in Waukesha drink from is contaminated with the highly radioactive element radium.  Waukesha residents, I am told were strong supporters of Scott Walker the Governor of Wisconsin.  Scott Walker is indeed from part of Waukesha.

What is my point?  If radioactive elements contributed to the Japanese Nuclear power plant disaster could they contribute to a great disaster in the United States based on the same concept?  Someone gets into a power position of authority that doesn't belong there?  Either their development or mental capacity has been ever so slightly influenced by the incident of the radioactive element in their drinking water...and what would the consequences for the rest of us be?  First of all, anyone who was poisoned in this manner might not want to admit that there is anything wrong with them, they might indeed go on to build nuclear reactors that are prone to failure or public policy that is prone to widespread failure.  But anyhow if a group of people had the same problem they might indeed feel that the reason they are the way they are has to do with their base genetic structure being less.  In other words they might feel that there is no way on earth that they could change because it was hereditary rather than a radioactive induced condition!  What type of gang behavior could result from this?  Could we see a group of people end up granting themselves special rights that the rest of us wont have?  Would a group like this want to limit the Constitutional rights of the rest of us in desperation for not wanting to accept themselves for what they are?  And the same thing is true with regard to other poisons that influence brain development at various life cycle stages isn't it?

Would people like this seek to sell your children drugs so that they are leveled down below them on the demographic scale?  Would the middle class be prevented from rising to the level of achievement commensurate with their real world level of knowledge?  Do you believe that a wealthy son whose father drinks vodka on the rocks all day is really smarter than the son of a middle class school teacher that spends time with his son and teaches him things a man will need to know?

I got on the issue of Hiroshima and Nagasaki based on the recent bombing in Boston and also the great threat the Nation faces from North Korea and its hidden allies?  So lets say the U.S. is bombed with a nuclear device and a leader emerges whose head is full of radioactive elements, and we cannot really see or are not told what justifies his actions! What are we to do?

PS. The motivation behind much of recent public policy has not been articulated to the public has it?  Or the motivation that has been articulated does not seem to make justifiable sense in and of itself.

So how do we test people for poor judgement before we are subjected to it?  Given the incidence of radium in the Waukesha water table do we need to do brain tests on people to make sure that radium is not disturbing their thoughts and ideas from what would normally be their thoughts~ absent the radium?  And do we need to test sectors of Waukesha residents brains from Radium damage?  Evidence would be for lack of electrical activity from the certain regions of  brain origin?  The radium may be gone from their systems but the damage irreversible and hidden from the public by a collusion of effort?  Do we need to do this before we are subjected to directed madness?

And if radioactive elements have been present in our natural environment for quite some time- might they explain the incidence of what can only be thought of as undeniable criminal motivation behind the actions of horrific leaders from World History?

Those of you who have read my writing know that I was concerned with the laziness of Scott Walkers left eye upon his initial campaign for Governor of Wisconsin.  And we are only learning know that the water supply from the County that he came from is contaminated with highly radioactive Radium!

Copyright 2013 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 04 17 2013 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com

ps. Interesting Story at link below.  It seems this man developed an addiction to Radium!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eben_Byers


PPS There are 100 odd and foreign chemicals in the umbilical cord of newborn infants today! If you have a radioactive element present during the development of the human brain what are the chances that the electrical emission of that radioactive element can cancel the developments of the human brain function that are based on electricity?  Can it be thought of as it would be impossible to hold a conversation while standing five feet away from a jet engine?

No comments:

Post a Comment