How many women get pregnant because they can sell that baby for money? 09 11 2018
So a woman is forced to give her baby up for adoption. She was married.
Shouldn't she really recieve money for it?
Shouldn't she get annuity income from it?
And what father would ever allow his baby to be sold? Expand that concept. What father would ever want a system to be in place whereby other fathers were forced to sell their babies?
If a woman is forced to give it up shouldn't she get money for it?
You have the Republican Party HIGHLY VALUING babies and pro life.
But does the woman you gave that up for adoption get money for it?
Would a superich person be able to devise a scheme where he buys a baby for his wife? Happens all the time in the United States. They are purchased from foreign countries.
The Republican Party puts a high value in terms of political priority on the prolife agenda. But not on compensating the mother. What does that amount to getting something for nothing?
Another form of capitalizing human life? Seems to completely disturb the natural order to me; in so many ways.
Bottom line. If you fairly compensated the woman who gave up her baby she would have so much money that she would not have had to given that baby up?
Perhaps there should be a law. A woman who puts her baby up for adoption is always allowed to buy it back for 1% of the proceeds she received from it?
But how much is that human life really worth? Can a dollar figure be put on it in terms of what the mother should receive?
I suppose you could take how much slaves were sold for and adjust that forward in terms of inflation?
And perhaps when you get to that number the mother who wants to buy the baby would never be able to afford it. Which should really be the case in all cases.
So how much was a slave sold for? Looks to be about $40,000.00 in those adjusted forward terms. But worldwide today a slave only costs $90.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+was+a+slave+sold+for&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab
So where does a slave cost $90 to purchase today? And who owns those slaves and who is profiting from them?
Are there any American Corporations who are profiting from the work done by a slave purchased for $90. I will assert that to be true. Should it be defacto legal in any way? No.
Could an unscrupulous United States Business man go somewhere where slaves cost $90 a piece. Buy 10 of them right away and some cheap land and be in the Plantation business? Not only that that evil son of a bitch would have the time of his life beating and whipping them wouldn't he.
And so we go to the verse from the Bible that tells us that Sarah took slaves in order to replenish her life.
Beast defined.
We should never be trading with any nation like that. Forget about what the revenue shortfall or impact would be. I mean never. Great countries lead by example. In order to be great you lead by example.
© 2018 Thomas Murphy
I believe a woman has a right to have an abortion. I don't believe a woman has a right to sell her baby. Our Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, agrees with me.
The Thirteenth Amendment.
A United States Corporation operating in a Foreign Country is indeed extending U.S.Corporate Jurisdiction to that place of Employment. Hence it is illegal.
But to me our Supreme Court looks like a group of drunks?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child-selling
© 2018 Thomas Murphy
So a woman is forced to give her baby up for adoption. She was married.
Shouldn't she really recieve money for it?
Shouldn't she get annuity income from it?
And what father would ever allow his baby to be sold? Expand that concept. What father would ever want a system to be in place whereby other fathers were forced to sell their babies?
If a woman is forced to give it up shouldn't she get money for it?
You have the Republican Party HIGHLY VALUING babies and pro life.
But does the woman you gave that up for adoption get money for it?
Would a superich person be able to devise a scheme where he buys a baby for his wife? Happens all the time in the United States. They are purchased from foreign countries.
The Republican Party puts a high value in terms of political priority on the prolife agenda. But not on compensating the mother. What does that amount to getting something for nothing?
Another form of capitalizing human life? Seems to completely disturb the natural order to me; in so many ways.
Bottom line. If you fairly compensated the woman who gave up her baby she would have so much money that she would not have had to given that baby up?
Perhaps there should be a law. A woman who puts her baby up for adoption is always allowed to buy it back for 1% of the proceeds she received from it?
But how much is that human life really worth? Can a dollar figure be put on it in terms of what the mother should receive?
I suppose you could take how much slaves were sold for and adjust that forward in terms of inflation?
And perhaps when you get to that number the mother who wants to buy the baby would never be able to afford it. Which should really be the case in all cases.
So how much was a slave sold for? Looks to be about $40,000.00 in those adjusted forward terms. But worldwide today a slave only costs $90.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+was+a+slave+sold+for&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab
So where does a slave cost $90 to purchase today? And who owns those slaves and who is profiting from them?
Are there any American Corporations who are profiting from the work done by a slave purchased for $90. I will assert that to be true. Should it be defacto legal in any way? No.
Could an unscrupulous United States Business man go somewhere where slaves cost $90 a piece. Buy 10 of them right away and some cheap land and be in the Plantation business? Not only that that evil son of a bitch would have the time of his life beating and whipping them wouldn't he.
And so we go to the verse from the Bible that tells us that Sarah took slaves in order to replenish her life.
Beast defined.
We should never be trading with any nation like that. Forget about what the revenue shortfall or impact would be. I mean never. Great countries lead by example. In order to be great you lead by example.
© 2018 Thomas Murphy
I believe a woman has a right to have an abortion. I don't believe a woman has a right to sell her baby. Our Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, agrees with me.
The Thirteenth Amendment.
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.[1]
A United States Corporation operating in a Foreign Country is indeed extending U.S.Corporate Jurisdiction to that place of Employment. Hence it is illegal.
But to me our Supreme Court looks like a group of drunks?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child-selling
© 2018 Thomas Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment