"Training someone not to see differences is training them not to learn."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Discussion of quote:
The Devils Advocate would argue that you are really training to learn only the things that they need to learn. The response to that would be that it is really conditioning in place of learning.
Now I am not talking about a misnomer of learning good behavior or learning bad behavior. Because I would assert that bad behavior isn't learned in the since of what learning is defined to be? Although criminals do learn very complicated schemes to defraud people. So perhaps a new term is needed to encompass both what is termed learned bad behavior and learned criminal behavior.
Wait a minute. What is learned bad behavior? Isn't it really the failure to learn good behavior! So indeed I am right. And hence what is criminality? Also the failure to learn good behavior? Or perhaps that is the early stage of life of the criminal. Now lets look at the adult criminal and attempt to apply a classification to them consistent as such. For some reason the adult criminal fails to live a normal life. They experience more pleasure from the criminality than non criminality? That construct being an example of how one is motivated; the person is motivated to do what they enjoy doing rather than what is hard for them to do. And hence back full circle; the criminal could not learn as a child. It was very difficult for them and emotionally stressful.
And indeed you may not be a criminal at all but you might learn something from this about yourself?
Did you ever hear the term, "the easy way out?" Does not the criminal take the easy way out their entire life.
So indeed am I making a firm distinction between "them" and "us"?
So back to the main quote. A good father shows their children a "difference" not for the bad of it but for the good of it. And perhaps a bad father shows a child a "difference" for the criminal opportunity in life it could represent for them?
******'
Now lets get a little biblical age and off topic.
So the ancient Essenes believed in having an evil master raise their children. And they juxtaposed the evil master to what was termed an exiled priest. Now contrast that to Jesus Christ. What did he say about himeslf, "I am the good shepherd." In effect he is asserting that he isn't an evil master. So indeed can the historical conflict Jesus Christ faced be thought to have occurred on those terms? A conflict between two sects? And because it resulted in death it means that they were not really two separate sects but completely different. I would say that they are completely different. But wait a minute. When Jesus Christ refers to satan perhaps Satan might have been the term for an Evil Master back in those days? In effect though I believe it is safe to say that Jesus Christ would not be having an evil master hanging around in the whereabouts?
Okay enough of that. Lets get back to the main topic. Raised in criminality. What is it really? The criminal though with a very keen mind would assert that his lifetime behavior is not of desperation but of opportunity? Opportunity that the evil master showed him?
Second Signature Line
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
And sadly enough. What if the "Father" Jesus Christ believed he was "talking" to all his life, was really an evil master!!!! What evidence can I present in affirmation of that? While Jesus Christ was nailed to the cross his last words were, "Father, why have you forsaken me?"
And my friends a lot of the other hoopla you read in the Bible does not stand up to the validity of that statement.
******'
Could you imagine if for every good deed you ever did that there was an evil master out there grinching in mental anguish with the nagging mindset, "Oh he's going to do something good again!"
What fate would someone like that be prone to create for mankind?
And could you imagine if your very own father was such, an evil master? Nothing you ever did in life would garner you the feeling of legitimacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment