Perhaps upon conviction if there is not another boat ramp on that lake the law should be that the house is to be torn down and a boat ramp placed there.
If there are two viable boat ramps on that lake then perhaps that lakefront property should be converted to a beachfront property or public fishing pier property!
And if the banks lent money for a mortgage to a drug dealer I really don't care if they don't get their money back. They should count their lucky stars that they are not convicted as being a party to organized crime.
******'
Oh wagon Christ.
Lets say that a lawyer owns a lakefront property and uses cocaine. Same as per above! But what about the lawyers wife! How could you say she doesn't get anything? Too bad! She gets to choose again and choose wisely! She should have chosen more wisely!
Oh my God, and what a terrible thing if all those lawyers wives would have to come to the sorry conclusion that they should have chosen more wisely.
So should someone like that be put on social security? Should they be allowed back into United States Business? I say no! Already proven themselves completely rotten as an adult!
So how about a form of Social Security for freed convicts? Whereby any whim of a violation gets it taken away like a violation of parole? But then what? I don't believe in creating the homeless.
But what do you do when you have a proven large faction of law breakers? I don't believe in work camps.
If you put them altogether you have just created a "commune" for them? So wait a minute, did I just prove organized crime in Communism? How much further than that do I need to go to prove it?
And there is a great concept, "How much further do I have to go to prove something?" Good lord!
So that wife perhaps gets a designation like someone on parole does? Lets see what would it be? Known conclusively to marry and support a member of organized crime? KCMSMOC perhaps pronounced Kissymock?
And perhaps there could be public health clubs where someone like that isn't allowed per that designation? And wouldn't you feel better if their were private clubs around that excluded members of organized crime. I mean think about it. Kind of opposite of how things are.
© 2024 Thomas Paul Murphy
Ps.
Now listen to your emotional reaction on this next part.-
Lets say that the lake home we took away from a drug dealer we then gave to a homeless person?
You being the neighbor of that house how would you feel? How should you feel?
You value the high spending criminal as being better don't you! The person who committed crimes to attain all that wealth, you value them as being a better neighbor! Don't you! So here we are dealing with a new type of persons perception aren't we! Does it have a basis in reality? That person has a stereotypical belief. But is it based in reality!
No comments:
Post a Comment