So let's say that a person with Autism was appointed to a Gov position responsible for cutting gov waste. And they are very wealthy. And it happened.
And in turn they want to or their actions have the effect of making life harder for everyone in our country.
What would be their unrealized motivation?
They are attempting further legitimize their own success.
And can they truly be fair? Given that dynamic? And ant external influences that drive that very dynic for them? That influence them to be that way?
In a sense it could be said they are being used to lessen the instance of people exactly like them becoming highly successful in the future?
As if to declare they actually came from a better road than the one they did?
As if to say they didn't have any help whatsoever? When they might not realize the intent of why they were helped?
Kind of like that old western where the guy says " The reason you hare them do much is because you are one of them."
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
So is there an element if extreme liberalism in favoring foreign cars made in the US versus the original United States brands? Somehow it looks like a weakness solution to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment