So you have gears on the camshafts that control the valves opening and closing. Those gears are on a timing chain system with the crankshaft of the engine.
And those gears have oil injected into them in a computer-controlled function in order to change the position of the camshafts on the timing chain.
So in effect they are a different force being applied to the timing chain force that is supplied by the crankshaft. So you are differentially and intentionally created a variable force on a moving timing chain. In effect it is a timing chain braking force or is it a timing chain advancement force? Does it really matter?
What it is doing is creating two different forces on that timing chain.
1. The force created by the crankshaft below.
2. The force created by the VVT gear that is actuated by electronically controlled oil pumping solenoids.
How long before that wears out and breaks, because it was designed that way?
The best machines have the fewest moving parts?
In this design you have a function that works against the longevity of another moving part.
In effect should it be thought of as being cattywampus? Like all of the rest of those novel engine designs you see short video clips on Facebook on? With a pitman arm swinging around like a propellor blade that just broke off a helicopter?
And who else wants their G/D money back? How do we get our money back? First we have to bring down the legality of the corporate shield. And we needed to do that 100 years ago already. Oh Christ they made it a felony to kill a dog that is biting you and giving you a lifetime disability. That is how sick they are.
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment