They always tell how many guns a person who is alleged to commit a crime has.
When a man or women gets in a drunken driving accident do they go search their refrigerator and see if they have beer or wine in there?
When a baby is born with a birth defect does the media demand to look in their refrigerator for the same?
When a child is failing in school does the media go on high alert and tell that the mother and father are getting drunk every night?
Maybe I initially liked to hear how many guns a drug dealer or pimp had? But we don't really hear that do we?
In fact human trafficking is a big problem but you rarely hear of a "pimp" prosecuted for the prevalence of the tracking and hear how many weapons they had?
That Second Amendment is there to keep us free. You may not like it. You may live in a household full of obnoxious simpletons. Whereby one of the obnoxious simpletons dominates everyone else. And that is the exact type of leadership we do not want at the highest levels of our government controlling us.
Autism is at a high rate. Does that mean that it was caused by our United States Constitution? Or is it more likely a dumbing down of family lines? Perhaps we emphasized success that didn't require a legitimate education.
We don't lessen everyone's rights under the false notion that it makes everyone safer to do so.
I mean even the right to free speech has been attacked. Exactly for that reason, the false notion that it makes us all safer and happier and peaceful to do so. It just allows those with a bad attitude to rule and then cry foul when someone says something that is both true and negative about them.
And I believe that if the media keeps it up for long enough they are going to achieve a goal of bringing down our Constitutional Rights.
And don't I dare say that people like that would be much happier under a different form of government? Somewhere else. Probably wouldn't be happy anywhere would they?
When someone gets lung cancer is the media there at the hospital to ask them right away how much they smoked?
When someone is diagnosed with aides is the media there to ask who they had sex with and what they did?
I guess I take issue because it is a very important Constitutional Right. And you want to ask the question, taken away a Constitutional Right ultimately leads to less freedom. So, who exactly and specifically doesn't the media want to be free? Scoff at it as paranoia if you want to, but there is something solid and true about it.
When a Prostitute is convicted (it doesn't happen does it) is the media there to ask her who else was a prostitute under her pimp?
Sure you say it really isn't a good comparison. Is it all I can think of? Or perhaps the media going after your Constitutional Rights is all that they can think of?
I take it as if the public is being chastised by false authority.
I think that we need to mandate gun ownership in this country. That might lessen....well it is kind of a sissy element that puts its arms back and waves them in alarm when confronted with dangerous things? I wonder how many people could handle a band saw or table saw? Perhaps that percent of skill level or personal responsibility has gone down in our country over the years. And I think that is the issue. Perhaps some mentally defective people have made easy money in our country. Money is power. And then that is projected on the rest of us. And by some mental delusion it means that their money means that the rest of us could never be as capable or as responsible as they are? Hence we no longer need such and such rights. Because the wealthy decided what is best for us. And a lot of uneducated people believe just that. Do not bite that rich hand that feeds you. Do not question trickle down Republican economics. Do not ask questions. "And you will be sitting pretty some day."
© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment