The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Saturday, May 3, 2025

Military Power Structures 05 03 2025

So I heard a mechanic on the internet say that a certain company (Honda) makes ridiculously strong engines. So that is where this writing came from.

So let's say that you have a high ranking military General who was gone off the wall and it is a time of war or it isn't.  Let's say his crimes are at the level of cannibalism and advocation of that.

Perhaps as a leader you are titled an Emperor of a country.

What I am getting at is how do you have that military general executed for those crimes?

He has a lot of power behind him at that level.

If you have to do it yourself there is a risk you will be killed.

And perhaps because you yourself are a war monger you can't see his crimes as being crimes so you really don't care.  I mean they made comfort women prostitutes out of a lot of women didn't they!

You declared War because you wanted the rest of the world to put you or consider you to be on a level equal with them in some respect.  However, your acts don't warrant that.

There is also another function of leadership in general that I see applied a lot everywhere.  Once you have someone working for you and doing the job what you consider successfully you are reluctant to fire them no matter what the reason?  And if you look at that idea in the framework of military power structures or perhaps your own work experience it really amounts to a personal weakness in leadership and not a strength.  And instances of that in our country doesn't make us great.  So it could even be characterized as an illegitimate power structure?  A power structure that doesn't benefit a democracy.  And when present in a foreign type of government...a power structure that is going to draw a winning wrath of humanity against you.

An organization that highly values bad people.

So our Founding Fathers put that in our Constitution, that we are not to have a standing army in times of peace.  None of those bobble heads on television ever talk about that.  Did you ever ask yourself why?  Because television was made part of a bad propaganda function through CIA Operation Paperclip?

A lot of our money goes into the military today.

Is there an element of the military being a job for those who couldn't graduate High School?  Is there an element of a standing military being counter to our Democratic Values.

Now ask yourself why our nation should fear foreign nations?  Should we fear them because we are a bad people or fear them because we are a good people?  Perhaps a good person realizes too late that they should fear the bad?  Perhaps most foreign governments that are not democracies readily create the bad.  Perhaps in the age of advanced weaponry the dynamics changed?

But let's look at humanity as a whole.  Should that be present in this century?  Those who would attack the good and peaceful of a foreign country just out of an idk animalistic envy?

I want to write about two other points today.  One has to do with Cromwell horrifically invading Ireland while at the same time allowing a different faction back into his country because he believed that they could help him with foreign conquests.  And the other point being the validity of an autistic database for the public.  For example, let's say that you marry one and she or he is stupid and worthless and all they want to do is fight over everything.  And your entire life is ruined because of that.  And they got you on a barbed money hook supported kids she had while drunk...Shouldn't you have been allowed to know that?  Or let's say you married someone with aides.  I mean good god didn't you have a right to know that?  And ask yourself who in the h3ll made this country the way it is today concerning that?  So you marry a woman good in bed, you thought it was love, she is dumber that a fence post and you were blinded by that.  Argued about absolutely everything because she was so stupid.  You then have to pay her alimony or child support?  Why?  Legally that could be interpreted as a Prostitution annuity fee?  I would characterize prostitution being illegal as a form of slavery per the Constitution.  So it would be illegal for you to pay that annuity fee.

Sure organized crime got their way in our country and broke our Constitution through an attrition of criminal activity.  And alcohol is legal.  But a man should not have to pay the price of that.  A man should not have to pay his ex wife for being that.  A man should not have his freedom be infringed because of that.  A man should not have that be a substitute for his pursuit of happiness in the land of the free and the home of the brave.  A man doesn't advocate the bad as what I have implied is bad above.  Nor does a man say that the general population should foot the bill for that bad.  But it was a government decision so that is who should pay that prostitution annuity?  But our Government shouldn't be paying prostitution annuities.  But for sure a man should not either before that!

There are other elements I would put on a national database available to the public.  And it has to do with a man not wasting his time desiring a woman who doesn't believe in the validity of heterosexual reproduction.  And perhaps you might not want your son hanging around a religious leader or adult authority figure, a male, who also does not believe in heterosexual reproduction.  

And do you want any of the above finding their way into a high ranking position in a Military Power Structure?

© 2025 Thomas Paul Murphy

And is a dual overhead cam variable valve timing engine really a valid engine design?


No comments:

Post a Comment