I created this Newspaper to put forth a much needed point of view. I have talked to many who have worked for Milwaukee's dominant news source on the side, and they have even expressed interest in my point of view. The Pulitzer prize was founded after Pulitzer because he created a newspaper that exposed great wrongdoings. He went against the other established Newspapers with his Newspaper that exposed corruption. His newspaper became number one. World News Starts Here!
One where the individual thinks, "I am not really committing a crime; because this is the only way that I can live."
So I can say two more things about this. Who is therefore drawn into criminal behavior?
1. Those that are mentally defective.
2. Those that work a full workweek and are not paid a living wage.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
The Republican Party Warranties every child born of incest or rape to be free from material defects for the life of the Republican Party.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Satire.
You can't be "it" and be a benefit to our Democracy of being "it" if you are illegitimately "it."
No matter what "it" may be.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Another name for a high speed rotary tool might be, "Spin Waster".
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
That is exactly what I think when I hear someone in politics declare it should be illegal for a woman to abandon a pregnancy resulting from rape or incest.
The Druids were said to have worshipped the monkey and engaged in horrific acts satanic witchcraft.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Here is one of the problems with regard to what the results might falsely compare to be?
Is Insider Trading Legal for Members of Congress? (davemanuel.com)
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
An Army in times of peace is an Army in times of peace 08 28 2022
And per the United States Constitution it is illegal!
So how can anything someone says about their service in an Army in times of peace be illegal?
Follow the logic? If the whole thing is defined to be illegal per the Constitution how can anything someone said about their service in it be deemed illegal?
And I am talking about perhaps if you saw War Crimes being committed in Viet Nam and were told to shut up about it or you would get no pension supper. Stuff like that.
I am talking about if you saw that Army in times of peace participating in illegal acts against United States Citizens!
If you saw what could be boiled down and meant to be treason and were told to shut up about it!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Off topic. I also want to say how a glass bottle a drink was served in, and it became popular during a war, the gestalt of which looks a lot like a hand grenade design that came before it.
As every once in a while the idea surfaces to divert Great Lakes water out West.
Why? So you can water your Cali Vineyards.
If they have a water problem out West then they need to stop production of "alcohol!". A lot of water is used in the prod. of alcohol.
Ban it out there and they would have plenty to drink. Also it would take care of our immigrant problem.
Eventually as to gene pool sobered up you would have close to zero gun violence problems.
No better way to unify a nation than that
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
And you know what else? I would ban all alcohol production in Wisconsin until the river water flowing into Lake Michigan is clean!
Heck I would ban it until crime rates drop and test scores go up. There would be zero cars driving straight into houses at high speed. Zero human trafficking. Absent the use of alcohol people would rather quickly have had enough of all the problems like that and vetted them.
"They ought to give you a new pair of shoes everytime you go to the Post Office because you are going to wear to yours out from standing in line so long."
"For the amount of time you are standing in line you might as well be delivering all their routes."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
I believe that someone that tells a woman who has been raped or a victim of incest that she cannot have an abortion; belongs on a chain gang.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
If your child was expelled from school or flunked out it means that you should not have had a child!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
"Hey, did you hear that swig'ger? You should not have been able to have a child!"
That might be my new go to word! Swig'ger!
And this is how I define it. A different tense of the word "Swig" to take a drink of something! So it means the faulted idealisms of someone who drinks.
School Choice just leads to Emboldened Flunkies! 08 25 2022
What should have happened instead of the voucher program or school choice?
Those parents in the bad neighborhoods needed to stand up and make those neighborhoods better! That is what needed to happen!
If they knew that the school down the block was bad they needed to stand up and make it better!
And who ends up in private schools? Those who were expelled or flunked out of public schools!
So why should we pay for it? It just leads to emboldened flunkies!
And we just suffered through 4 complete years of an emboldened flunky!
What do I view millionaire professional athletes who speak worse than a Gomer? They are emboldened flunkies!
You know, we can have some standards in our Democracy?
Do you know what the word is for those who have no standards? Amoral!
The presence of the emboldened flunky in our democracy is the pinnacle of amorality!
It does us absolutely no good!
It erodes the freedom that was fought for!
The emboldened flunky knows nothing of principles like that.
Should we allow emboldened flunkies in any position of authority? Again we do not have to promote amorality in our nation in order to comply with some emboldened flunkies conception of liberty.
And what is that? A woman must keep a child incestuously inseminated in her? That is the faulty reasoning on an emboldened flunky! And what is that, a woman must keep a pregnancy from rape? That is the cuckooed out idealism of an emboldened flunky!
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
When you can't flunk a flunky haven't you really emboldened a flunky?
Haven't you really contributed to them believing something about themselves that isn't true?
And what happens when that eventually is going to cause a conflict with that individual!
And his idea of education was to put a retard on speed (amphetamine/ Ritalin?) What good does a retard on speed do anyone? What good does it do to give someone prone to hyperactivity because they can't learn speed?
And are not the mass shooters about occurring in line with the time frame of that No Child Left Behind Policy? The bad seed was planted by George Bush! Did you ever stop to ask yourself that question? Who planted this G/D bad seed?
And that is what you are going to get with an alcoholic child of an alcoholic!
Why! Good God why! Why embolden a flunky?
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
A Republican can best be defined by this phrase,
"If we all had to sit around and wait for you to understand the meaning of something; none of us would know anything!"
It is epitomized by the George Bush policy of no child left behind? Which means essentially you can't flunk someone who deserves to be flunked?
It is in the extreme liberal birthing policy of the Republican Party. And that anti abortion policy is lower than the lowest liberal policy that there is.
Where do they think the criminal minded come from? How come they don't understand that if you want to have a child you are supposed to marry a woman before you get her pregnant? Anything less than that is sinfully amoral. Sinfully amoral being equivalent to what the Republicans want you to believe the word liberal means. Again, if we all had to sit around and wait for Republicans to understand what that means; none of us would know anything!
We saw it with the peculiar actions of the last President too, didn't we? If we all had to sit around and wait for them to understand what the severity of the Covid-19 Virus was then exactly 1,067,549 Americans would be dead because of it.
And so they have squatted in positions of authority like charlatans that don't want to leave town!
And they hate student debt forgiveness too. Why? Because they want you to be on the hook in terms of debt! They want you to die owning nothing and owing everything. Why? Because nothing for you means more for them. The person who has mounds of student debt likely couldn't get a job commensurate with that level of debt. Why not? Because in a Republican world it doesn't matter what you know, who you know is what matters! Again, if we all had to sit around and wait for them to understand something; none of us would know anything!
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
So how can we figure this out?
We need stats on the level of student debt in Wisconsin.
We need stats on the level of alcohol consumption by the UW System. And what might be considered an average price for such amount of alcohol.
715,800 people in the state have a combined student debt of $23.1 billion. Which equates to $32,230 per the sites stat offering.
level of student debt in wisconsin at DuckDuckGo
UW Madison has the highest alcohol consumption of any college in the nation. If I were Governor of this state I would attempt to flip that statistic to ZERO on a dime! And then I could act like Ron Johnson and say if you don't like it you can leave the State!
Seriously if what is considered to be a local type government can contradict the United States Constitution with regard to gun ownership then we can also ban alcohol via the exact same legal screw.
Okay I am not going to find that stat I am looking for but we will just use that $4 billion found here, and that likely isn't high enough.
how much alcohol is consumed by uw madison at DuckDuckGo
4bil divide by 715,800 equals $5,588.oo of that $32,230? No that isn't apples to apples. Because the 4 bil is for one year and the $32,230 is for four years. So $5,588 times 4 = $22,352 in alcohol debt for a four year degree. Now lets see if that number makes sense. 365 times 4 equals. 1,460 days in a four year degree. So 22,352/1460= $15 dollars a day spent by that looser on alcohol.
So $22,352/32,230 = 69% of that student debt should not be forgiven.
And these are all just back of the envelop numbers, cuffed, contrived to start to prove a point.
And we are to assume that it is these degreed individuals who determined it is somehow amoral for a woman to not keep a pregnancy caused by rape or incest?
George Bush once stated we are in the middle east because the Gog and Magog are there? That looks to be a little misdirection leading to me.
And so indeed all of your college debt will be forgiven except your bar bill. And that debt will be converted to be owned by the local taverns and breweries, wineries, moonshine jug thumbers whatever. So you will pay them for the rest of your lives. Interest on all the jugs you thumbed while you went to something called college.
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
And guess what, that sh1t kid who didn't make it through college, but owns a tavern, is a millionaire! And you have to put up with much worse than that!
And if you have a normal son they are going to drive that son crazy with voices and mentally disable him/her upon graduation. And if you have a normal daughter the green eyed monster is going to catch up with that one when she has her first baby, and drive her crazy with voice and mentally disable her. That is why women get it a little later in life than men do.
Is that we are allowed to blame someone else for the evil we foster within ourselves.
That we as human beings are somehow mentally flawed, all of us, and therefore need the concept of a savior.
There is big money in normalizing mental retardation? Big money in propagandizing the notion that mental retardation can be normalized?
What does that savior model of business amount to?
All of your life's sins and criminal actions well be normalized with God upon your death? And forgiven because you are human and humans are flawed.
All you have to do is say that you believe even though you willfully live your entire life not consistent to that belief.
If indeed heaven really consisted of the accumulated mentally flawed it wouldn't be heaven would it! It would be hell.
The above is not a belief system of men.
But it allows those of lower mental means to have a sense of oneness every Sunday? To allow the punch drunk and uneducable to believe they have commonality because everyone around them is flawed! To look around and say, "How beautiful is this, we are all flawed."
Isn't it really a business maneuver? To get those who you sold wine from your vineyard to and made mentally defective a sense of belonging in the community? So that they don't have a self-realization that they are not as good as everyone else? It is a way to support a business that should never be supported. It is a way to support a business that lessens the realizable employable base of a democracy.
Again, if you get to the afterlife and all around you all you see are those who lived their lives terribly, criminally, irresponsibly, unaccountably; you are not really in heaven you are in hell.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
"If they were good, they would have done away with all of that already."
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
Eye pressure is measured in mmhg, millimeters of Mercury.
Per internet search between 10 and 21 is normal.
But what does that number mean in terms of something you can understand.
Per an internet calculator it can be converted into a psi or pounds per square inch reading.
So if you have 18 it equates to .348062 psi per the internet based convertor.
And I find that interesting.
And I don't vouche for any of the accuracy or correctness of any of this.
But there is a small difference in psi between normal eye pressure and high, potentially indicative of Glocoma eye disease.
I could table run the numbers but zero time.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
It would make a great case study and be of tremendous benefit for our Democracy if it were documented every time DT lied. Why he lied, how he lied and the motivation for him lying.
We are going to want to label and spot that behavior well ahead of time. For the longevity of our Democracy.
And do you know of one single legitimate human being that could do that? That could catalog and index all of that without getting sick from it? Getting sick from listening to it? Perhaps you are on the other side of the coin than me.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
And did you ever watch television and say to yourself, "This person is so odd that if I listen to them for too long I will get sick? And I really don't want to be one with whatever thread of behavior they represent? I don't want to buy into the version of themselves that they are selling. I don't want to legitimize that with my cognitive time. I don't want to waste my mental energy thinking about their oddness. I don't want to have to think of solutions where there are none for their speech defect. I don't want to start to talk like them! I would never want to start to act like them!
And perhaps ask yourself this, since you started watching them on television did your life really get any better? Or did it get worse. No better way to gauge the true influence someone has on you than that!
For example after watching them on television did you too then take a carefree attitude? But you might not even be aware that caused problems for you? You might have a child from it, that can't learn? You might have drank a mimosa with your breakfast too and crashed the car. You might have eaten the food on the commercials and got fatter than your whole house. You might have tried to sing and the people around you found it completely unbearable. You might have thought you were the King of Siam or the Queen of Sheeba after watching them on television and lost all of your friends because of that arrogance. You might be in jail because you watched an actor who can't even read in real life shoot em up in a cops and robbers type movie.
What we need on television is a guy with a mop. You can turn on that G@d D@mned television and watch the guy with the mop mop the school hallways! That is what we need on television.
A swivel with one or two end that can be snell knotted.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Do you know that if they bite you and you get rabies you are going to die an excruciatingly painful death?
And yet it is illegal to fire a firearm in city limits?
Our Founding Fathers did not want us to have to put up with this!
And there is nothing embellished or deceitful about any of this is article. There are no radical in or extremist elements to in it either.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Draft
45.95x 2080x45=
Lwage 2 children x yearly hour multiple x 45 years=
1,000,000,000 / above figure=232
232 lifetime jobs at a living wage to support his family w 2 children for 45 years per billion of the billionaires billions.
And guess what, just one of those people could do more benefit for our Democracy than the billionaire.
Now I could run the numbers for living wage per single person and that would be a lot more lifetime jobs but I don't have the time.
Data stats link: find the site yourself w a quick Google search.
To complete the econ impact would require total amount of billions billionaires have.
But billionaires are not really billionaires. Let's say tobacco holdings were force liquidated? That b air would no longer be one. Ephemeral money. Up in smoke money. So don't ever consider such a person ad being of higher status than you.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Broader market. To create a novel art used item, whereby various colors can be formed an do made by into base sets of such crayons by end user.
To be used by children over a certain age too, if heating danger elements in making such crayons can be overcome, in such a "permanent" equipment sold with. Upper melting point of wax is 154 degrees F.
Base item of invention consists of threaded plunger and a threaded tube about same dimensions as common writing instruments.
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
"A beast not wanting you to be able to protect yourself from a beast."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Finally got around to making a potato salad from that "Idaho" website and it is
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Has a neighborhood that has gone down the tubes ever been able to recover? 08 20 2022
Thomas Murphy
That is a really good sunflower seed bread, peach jam and my boil/fried potatoes.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
"There used to be a woman there and I think she ran the place better than the short guy who has his head in the clouds."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
And under what Presidency?
Good ole Abraham Lincoln!
Abe Presidency "March 4, 1861 – April 15, 1865"
So are its actions consistent with Freedom of the People? Are its actions consistent with curbing economic insurrections? Both strong tenets of the President who it was created under.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=when+was+abraham+lincoln+president
https://www.google.com/search?q=internal+revenue+service+created&client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=ALiCzsZybckxWlYE8-vw5UuzNLuLWr0ctg%3A1661011509752&ei=NQYBY9XILe-z0PEP-IyQ8AY&ved=0ahUKEwiVt4aI5tX5AhXvGTQIHXgGBG4Q4dUDCA0&uact=5&oq=internal+revenue+service+created&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBggAEB4QFjIGCAAQHhAWMgUIABCGAzIFCAAQhgM6BwgAEEcQsAM6BwgAELADEEM6CggAEOQCELADGAE6EgguEMcBENEDEMgDELADEEMYAjoSCC4QxwEQrwEQyAMQsAMQQxgCOgoIABCABBCHAhAUOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToFCAAQgAQ6CAgAEIAEEMkDSgQIQRgASgQIRhgBUPsBWK4JYIALaAFwAXgAgAF9iAHqBpIBAzEuN5gBAKABAcgBE8ABAdoBBggBEAEYCdoBBggCEAEYCA&sclient=gws-wiz
And I am talking about the idea of investing it in the stock market?
Because not too long after all that social security money is placed in a stock market the scale is going to teeter and it is all going down a funnel back to the very wealthy.
The very wealthy who not only shorted the stock market but also the human soul of the Untied States.
And sure, they will say that the stock market decline was caused by an external event, when that happens.
But the truth is they make their profits by trading against the public.
Which means they make money by .....shorting our Democracy.
And if you ever worked in the industry you would understand that personality type very well.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
A Republican Is 08 20 2022
"A Republican is someone who should have been sitting in the corner with their mouth shut for the last fifty five years."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Is this a Geometric Constant 08 20 2022
And bear with me if it has been decades since High School Geometry.
So one forms a circle with a compass. Then you use your compass set to the same diameter and draw three connected arcs by starting at one point on the circumference. And you connect the points and you have formed and equilateral triangle.
So what is the distance of each side of that equilateral triangle in relation to the diameter of the triangle.
Here are my numbers.
My circle is 10.25" or perhaps 10 7/32" in diameter. And the sides of the equilateral triangle work out to be 8.75.
So you take that 8.75 and you divide it by 10 7/32" and you get .85626911314984.
Now you subtract that from 1 and you get .1437308868501
Does that look like Pie? 3.1416? No that doesn't look like pie.
Now perhaps we will divide 1 by .14373088868501 and get: 6.95744671969242
But lets subtract that 6.957 from 10 and see if that looks like pie.
10-6.957=3.0425532803075.
Yeah, I think that looks pretty close to pie.
:)
To out can't tell me that isn't about the size as a pie.
And there is a reason I am trying to figure to his out. It has to do with upscaling something.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
A Priest surrounded by never married nuns somehow comes to the conclusion that abortion is wrong rather than the promiscuity and unwed sex that causes the pregnancies being amoral?
In effect anti abortion condones a multitude of amoral and sinful behavior!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
1. Is it because we have people drinking alcohol in the United States who should not even be able to afford it?
Is that revenue really beneficial to our nation?
2. Do some judges get kickbacks from private prisons if they convict and sentence people to serve there? Can you believe it happened? Which might cause us to re-examine if a judge should determine the prison? I really don't know the details, do they?
But with regard to "1" that uneducated and perhaps uneducable class of people using drugs is going to cause violence. A less intelligent person unable to determine the validity of a counterargument to them and violence results. Should we have to put up with it? That demographic?
What about immigration? What if it is determined through statistics that an immigrant population will never reach a base level of intelligence? Do we keep letting them in or consider them a risk to our democracy?
Good God look at the horror of it! Do we let them in in order to fill our prisons?
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Poked in on my cell phone.
So I was researching this and I don't have time to figure out the answer right now.
According to search results Diesel burns cleaner than gasoline.
However Diesel is less refined then from gasoline.
So there is a contradiction there.
does diesel burn cleaner than gasoline - Search (bing.com)
is diesel more refined than gasoline - Search (bing.com)
I don't have time to figure it out right now.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
If I were to buy a truck and put one of those solid truck bed covers that covers the rim of the truck bed like a lid I would want one that could angle backward from the front so that in the winter when snow fell upon it I could open the back of the lid near the cab of the truck and all the snow would slide off backwards where I had positioned it to go at the time.
Most of them spring up in the back by hydraulic actuators. But I would want one with varied hydraulic actuators. Whereby they could not accidently open on the highway and cause a windbrake type swerving.
And indeed, for all I know it has already been invented. If not, I just invented it right here!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
What is that child put up for adoption? I would assert that it came from an unwed mother. Is that not amorality?
What is wrong with a young woman declaring her sexuality in such a way that she makes the decision not to get pregnant before a man makes the commitment and marries her?
It takes two to tango. What is wrong with a young man knowing enough not to get a woman pregnant unless he is married to her? Anything less than that is amorality.
And you want to say the poor can't afford birth control? What does that really mean? It means the poor are more amoral!
So how did you get religion to back the amorality? Because the priesthood was really a job for those who were would be hobos?
Do the amoral make all the money in the world today and therefore control church policy through that value of their larger donations? Ever meet a brewery owner, a bar owner a cigarette co executive that wasn't filthy rich? Rich not on just amorality but on sin. What would the Bible say about smoking tobacco? I mean if you believe that Jesus Christ represented morality you would say that he would condemn it.
But does Jesus Christ really represent morality? They were going to stone an amoral whore in the Bible and Jesus Christ prevented it. So he took the side of amorality.
Interestingly enough. It was Elijah who through the wicked amoral Jezebel to be rendered and eaten by wild dogs. And it was Elijah who Jesus Christ called to while on the cross? "Elijah (or father) why have you forsaken me?" To worship a God means that you do not contradict them?
So look at where this all heads? Are we going to end up with a wicked Jezebel in charge of the United States someday? Put on the pulpit by the Church? God help if we do.
It is highly amoral to say a woman has to keep a pregnancy from someone that raped her or incest rape. Highly amoral! Highly sinful! The only place that point of view can come from is, would be hobos?
And what is someone who got a job via who they know (networking) rather than what they know? A would be hobo!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
And I would indeed assert that every alcoholic thinks in cotton mouth/brained amoral terms.
"See to it he don't remember anything he learned on the plantation."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
You shouldn't have to own a dog in order to keep the rabbits out of your backyard!
What happens? The dogs will drive the rabbits out of their backyard and into yours!
And those rabbits will seed your yard with weeds!
Nor should you have to enlist a chemical fertilizer company. Why don't you want to do that? Because you believe it isn't good for the water supply, you know, where you go fishing!
Is it fair that a dog owner can kill a rabbit with its dog but you can't? (I really don't know the legality of it. But I think you can't do it.)
Also anyone who has ever had pet rabbits should also be charged with that surcharge?
Why? Because what is going to happen is that they are going to end up letting those rabbits go in their backyard and they are going to end up in yours!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Oh, don't you just love it?
"My dog bit you not me!"
"And someday you are going to learn to be an adult."
Isn't that also a lot like Jim Jones? Isn't that doctrine used a lot in the occult or cults?
And okay so the person that they are saying it to likely didn't have much in the first place? So it really isn't a big deal to them. If you don't have anything in the first place giving up your worldly possessions is an easy choice to make.
But you might say, "Really, you want me to give up a photograph of my mother too?"
"Absolutely." The cult leader would say, followed by, "You must declare that Jesus is your savior!"
Okay so someone doesn't have anything and they join up and they get fed and clothed and sheltered. Not so bad right?
Wrong! What if all along they had an infinite more amount of potential than the cult leader? And because they had so much potential in the first place that is how they somehow ended up "homeless?"
Follow my lead here? Two sides to the same ugly hand here?
So a criminal cult network is then created, which only accomplishes what? Keeping those who have protentional from realizing the benefit of it.
Meanwhile all the money begged, borrowed or stolen goes right to the Oliver who is the cult leader. No matter what title they declare themselves to be.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
So someone who is criminal minded from birth reads the bible completely different than you or I do. To them it is like a road map to satanism?
And did not Jesus meet his disciples by happenstance? As if they were wandering and homeless, perhaps unable to be educated? And what did they turn out to be? They turned out to be of poor character! Jesus ended up calling Peter Satan, and Judas betrayed him. And they all split up the money they got for handing him over and used it to buy a cemetery. And then they too were ~all hunted down and killed.
Also Jesus asserted he was betrayed. What does that really mean? It means he didn't really go willingly! The Church wants you to believe he went willingly! No, when you are betrayed it isn't willingly.
John 3:16
What a bunch of crap.
Didn't anyone, absolutely no one? Didn't anyone ever stop to consider that was Mother Mary's son they took and nailed to a cross?
He was the son of God but he was also the son of Mary wasn't he!
The Bible doesn't read Mother Mary so loved the world that she gave it her son.
The Bible doesn't read Mother Mary wanted you to give her son all of your pain and suffering, as is implied in Church on every Sunday!
What did Mother Mary have to say about it? Happy as could be right? Is that how dumb you actually believe the world public is?
The Church wants to separate the thought of those issues doesn't it! It isn't really Mother Mary's son when he is nailed to the cross and his lungs are falling out. It is the son of God! "Look Mother Mary that is really only Gods son up there not yours!"
Absolute junk! And I know the "who" of who wrote that, but you don't!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
And you have never noticed how some religious authorities are all shifty and weak eyed?
It is an alibi that doesn't add up. An alibi that is split because it does not include the mother. It can't include the notion of the mother because if it did it wouldn't add up. A split is also known as a schizm. It is a Schizo Alibi. Hence part of the greatest deception in world history.
Everything that is wrong with the United States today can be traced directly to this lie!
When the "State" steps in and takes the child from a drug abusing mother away from them isn't the State really making the statement, "There is absolutely no way that person (mother in this case) can be reformed?"
Hold that thought for a moment, the construct of, "There is absolutely no way that person can be reformed?"
So that determination has been made by the State in the above case. So how come that determination isn't made with other problem type of persons in other problem types of situations?
For example to allow a convict to go free but not allow them to have a gun. Doesn't the fact that you are not allowing them to have a gun really mean that the statement, "There is absolutely no way that person can be reformed is being made?"
Does a person like that offer a good mix to diversity? No. Is there any one of us that would like a person like that to be our neighbor? A person whereby the statement, "That person cannot be reformed and is restricted from having a deadly weapon."
So there is a limbo there. You wouldn't want someone like that as a neighbor because every time you walked out the door of your dwelling, they would give you the heebee geebees.
But where is that person going to live? And where do the people who legislated the decision, they should be allowed to be free live? They don't live in the same places do they. One will be poor without any opportunity, the one you don't want to have a gun. And therefore, really believe can never be reformed. And the other likely lives in a neighborhood so expensive that the person released is never going to get anywhere near it!
When a father runs out and leaves a family, what statement is he making? Isn't he making the statement that he can never be a father to that child or a husband to that woman? What is the cause of that? Do we not have a responsibility to restrict the cause of that?
*****'
But what about mental illness; schizophrenia? A man who gets it tends to get it right after the right of passage to manhood, which today is learning all the skills needed to support a family. Perhaps after high school, trade school or academic based college degree. And when does a woman likely get it? She gets it a little later in life. After she has a baby or perhaps two.
But take a real good look at those two timeframes! Can you see how someone or perhaps a very low intellect would be extremely jealous of either the man or the woman at those times in their lives? Can a person with extremely low intellect ever really be reformed, they have reached the age of adulthood and they are still that same way. Which doesn't really mean they are mentally retarded. For that would be too good a statement to make about them. For the word retard means to delay. In this case the learning phase of their life has already come and gone and they didn't keep up and hence they are not delayed. In effect they will never be as good. So they are not delayed. That is far to optimistic. The word retard is far too optimistic. Hence there is an element of fraud in the use and application of it!
In effect they can never be reformed because they never reached the base level they are supposed to be at in the first place and never will.
Now what if you had some kind of tribe of green eyed monsters amoung us. Perhaps the y came over from a boat from this nation or that nation.
When an American woman has a baby they somehow collude to ruin that family? That baby goes on the market just like cattle. And lets say that family was ruined by alcohol. What would you say, "Oh don't you dare restrict the access to alcohol."
When an American man graduates from college and gets a good paying job, somehow they collude and at witching hours in the night they prevent that man from sleeping so he can't keep that job, or any other required to raise a family.
Who is the green eyed monster attempting to protect and why? Who is the green eyed monster making an economy of?
As always you likely can't understand any of this and you find it very disturbing. And perhaps you even want to say it can be used to condemn me in some way. That it should be used to diagnose me in some way. Are you the type of person who would want to be a participant in the above? Ask yourself that. Presume that what I am asserting is true. And ask yourself "Am I the type of person who would want to be a participant in that?"
So yes I was raised a Catholic, 8 years of Catholic Grade School. And that is exactly why I am Pro Choice. Lets see if you can figure out the meaning of this next statement. "Are you the one who wants to take mother Mary's baby from her?" What religion are you? Guised voodoo?
And that right there is at the core of my belief system regarding Pro Choice.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
https://www.upcounsel.com/social-security-cap
But what this amounts to is that these people are considered a different and better class of people than the rest of us.
They are considered a class of people that by contrast definition from them is not a problem class.
The logic might be a little hard to follow and I might not have it articulated quite right, but that is our nations problem right there.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Meaning, if they are all providing for their own needs and everyone else there how come they need to attack other countries?
When they attack another country are they not in fact stealing that other countries resources?
So again how come they can't create their own "Resources?"
Because they don't have enough in COMMON to make it worthwhile?
Because they don't have enough COMMON good to do so!
And what is COMMUNISM? In effect it is a form of Government where you don't have to give credit where credit is due?
And hence you end up with no credit!
And if you have no credit it really doesn't matter whether you are perceived to have credit or not; your nation isn't going to be able to provide for its own needs because of that restraint! In other words you created a form of Government whereby it is defined to be all in common?
And then you didn't really give credit where credit is due, because by definition that isn't how that form of Government works. In effect it is guised tyranny.
What does it mean to be an independent nation? It means, "Hey look buddy go get your own lunch! You can't have mine today! And I have no desire to have whatever type of swept up crumbs you could conjure up."
Can Communism lead by example? Apparently not! To lead by example means this, "Look at what I am doing independently than you; do you think you can beat it? You do think you can win against me under fair terms?" And look at that moral? It is just this, "I would respect your work if you did. But would you respect my work if I did?" See what I am getting here?
Why does Communism need to look to other nations in order to support it?
Because there isn't enough COMMON good present in it to support itself.
Does it amount to this? We will create stodgy factories and drink potato liquor until we find ourselves in a mess with other nations, because we didn't have enough COMMON good to support ourselves?
I hope that some of you enjoy my stream of conscience writings. I hope you see the common good represented by them.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Part II?
Capitalism is a Business Economy. But what happens when Capitalism is forced to make business decisions regarding people? They better be fair ones, right? But who should be able to determine what are fair business decisions regarding the people in a democracy? Should the people who got rich selling tobacco determine what fair decisions are regarding the people? Should the people who got rich selling alcohol determine that? How about the Chemical Co billionaires who evaded environmental liability? Who feels they are the best people to make what amounts to business decisions regarding people? Where are we going to draw the line? What happens in Capitalism when those who draw the line have all the money and are not going to draw the line fairly?
So let's say that you get a Real Estate mogul as President. He lives his whole life by raising the rent and evicting those who can't pay? Then he is believed to organize a riot whereby essentially our very own Government is evicted? And it isn't like he is ever going to read this slump over with his hands on his face and cry is it!
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
In terms of United States military use our country was formed with a "Get them out of here policy."
Meaning when the British came over here changing our laws and violating our rights we formed militia groups and got them out of here in the Revolutionary War.
It was also written in our Constitution that we are not to have an Army in times of Peace.
But we are to have a well maintained navy. But is the purpose of that Navy to fight in foreign wars alongside countries that do not have the standards of our Constitution and perhaps even have a form of Government that we had to establish our freedom from? Of course not.
The purpose of that navy is to prevent those who do not have our Constitution from ship to shore invading us!
Now I could form a list of who I think doesn't belong here. And I could even articulate why in consistency with the Constitution. But that Constitutional Right to do so has already been compromised in our nation. But it falls along these lines, and it is not an idealism, if you can't live here among us without violating our rights then this isn't a good fit for you.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
And so, for example, I went to have some corn chips and salsa just now. Looked all over the fridge for the last jar that I bought. Noticed I had a tomato on the counter while doing so.
Found the jar of salsa and then said to myself, "None of them are any good!"
So what if there was a website that listed the commonly used ingredients not in salsa but in all recipes?
It could list them in this fashion
Commonly used ingredients:
Less commonly used ingredients:
But for example with regard to salsa something more plain might be nice.
But what if you could just glance at a list like that to suit your own taste when making something rather than have to take some of the taste guessing out of it?
And I likely make things with ingredients neither commonly or less commonly added.
But it would be a great starting point to have a website like that.
It would be great for barbecue sauce to. Like, none of those are any good!
And I scraped some white specks of the top of the inside of this jar before I put in my bowl with chips.
But what am I just realizing now? The whole thing is fermented and tastes like beer ferment. And there is no mistake about it because there is no beer in my fridge, I don't buy it.
So with salsa you have:
Small chunks of tomato
Some small chunks of onion
Some small chunks of green pepper.
Some spices, likely cayenne,
Some sugar of some type in there.
Is there a wheat flour type thickener that has been clarified?
Some salt.
Some black pepper or black pepper extract I believe I taste.
Is that parsley or chive flake?
What is in there.
Actually, the fermentation makes it taste better than it was originally.
You know, on second thought I am tossing this in the garbage.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
What if the acting President determined how much money you made?
Not only is it a what if question it is a comparative now type question too.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Because we understood the meaning of the words better in order to use it to write a Superior form of Government.
Also the British English is more spoken in long vowels indicative of both mental retardation and I assert homosexuality.
I would go so far to say that the long vowels are consistent with genetic disorders whereby such individuals in power persecute the general upwardly mobile populous.
Bottom line we understood the meaning of the words better; hence our spoken version of it is better.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
"It is like you want our country to be 'this version'; and nothing else matters."
It doesn't matter if 'this version' is completely contradictory to the Constitutional Rights of those who believe in Constitutional Rights!
Interesting point isn't it? Disregard the Constitutional Rights of those who believe in Constitutional Rights because you desperately need our country to be 'this version.'
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
"You say that you are having a workplace problem with wong vowel? Can't be true."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
"You also say wong vowel is threatening Taiwan? You say wong vowel..."
If I ever won leadership of this nation it would be like a new cartoon series, "I am Wong Vowel, I am here to help you."
If I can manually focus my camera faster than it can autofocus then it really isn't an auto focus camera!
Automatic Focus means just that! Point the camera and it is focused!
So perhaps a new nomenclature should be adopted to help the consumer find the best value for their money?
Since it really isn't autofocus. It needs to be labeled with a lesser term. Such as Camera Internal Protocol Focus, CIPF. Or Sensor Based Focus, SBF.
And in which case, lets presume SBF is used, then there should be ratings as to SBF speed of image target attainment and focus. So that one can compare how truly close SBF is to what should be termed Auto Focus.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
An interesting point regarding this is who takes the "sell side" argument and who takes the "buy side" argument.
Republicans Played the Devils Advocate on Covid Safety Measures 08 12 2022
I mean they fought all of that. They fought the notion that it was severe. They fought the notion that a greater adult sense of responsibility was required concerning it.
And on one hand they want to secure the border with Mexico but on the other they don't want to secure the "Airport Borders" with foreign travel? That is scatterbrain logic!
How many cases of monkeypox entered the country? 10,768.
How many cases in Wisconsin? Looks to be 38.
So if you divide 10768 by 50 States you get? 215.36
Stat link: https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/outbreaks/index.htm
And it is because of homosexuality?
*****'
And they have great screeners in Airports don't they? Someone comes near the place with a gun and it is a serious crime. Even though it is a Constitutional Right!
However they have no screeners for virus's at airports. Look at that body count, 1,361,046.
No compare that to any potential fatality from bringing a gun on a plane?
I don't see how anyone would want to set foot in New York, FL or California without one. Find yourself in a taxi that goes down queer street in one of those places and you will think differently about it!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
There ought to be a relatively inexpensive coating that can either be lightly brushed or sprayed on a cardboard box whereby you could sit that cardboard box outside and it would be waterproof and last for at least five years in a winter/summer season geography.
Why? I bought a new garden hose nozzle. And I paid a little more for it. I want to have a place to keep it outside near my garden hose spigot, therefore I can always easily find it. And because it is protected from the elements I do not have to worry if I miss a few days change of the season and it freezes and cracks and becomes zero.
But I am tired of making boxes for everything. So we need a better solution.
Plastic isn't a solution!
But if all boxes were made with a lid that envelopes the upper rim of a box then if the material of the box were waterproof then so would be the box.
What would be wrong with saying all cardboard boxes have to be made like that? And if a consumer had the option to make it durable?
Perhaps a half gallon of the chemical needed to make a cardboard box durable should cost a dollar?
I know what you are thinking. That cardboard is recycled and used over anyway.
But energy is used in recycling and also more trees are still being cut down in spite of it.
Ever keep a quart of household cleaner in your basement. You go to get it and somehow it has all evaporated in spite of the lid being tight? Where did it go? It went into your lungs and blood didn't it!
So indeed all household chemicals should be kept outside.
And here is a great analogy to a predator among us?
All chemicals should be kept outside just as a camper keeps the meat outside and far away from his tent to prevent personal harm from bears!
And can hear the three toed Chemistry Professor having a crying fit again!
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
Okay if we were truly one people in the United States today then we would all believe Consistently to and with the United States Constitution!
So in spite of all the cultural propaganda of oneness we are not a nation of oneness.
For there is a higher responsibility to the Constitution that is not being met by that diversity.
The first people who formed our nation believed in that Constitution.
And they added principles to it as we were attacked for foreigners.
They added those principles because they knew that they assured freedom.
And what is happening today is those with imposter beliefs to our nation are attempting to invalidate principles of freedom.
Because they can't live by the standard of our nation. They want to bring that standard down to that of the countries they got on the boat to get here from.
It is happening.
The propaganda being that a nation of oneness in diversity can only survive with a form of Government less than our Constitution. The problem with that false idealism is that all freedom will be gone because of it.
Ever meet someone who speaks in terms of false idealisms? Even though they do not speak of idealisms at all; they are still speaking in terms of idealisms that they believe in and are false idealisms.
When what is a blissful idealism to a group of such people is an absolute horror to those who believe in the United States Constitution.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
You can tell who the victims of racism in a country are by which races are declining in population?
How else would you think about it and define it if not like that?
A race is declining in population because it is a victim of racism.
And it might even be occurring because of actions from those who are believed to be members of their own race.
How long before they want to throw the concept out because this is the true meaning of it?
And believe that race needs to be a lot more narrowly defined than it is. For example by country of origin? Why? Because we know that people from certain countries have different diets that they do better with. Which means that is genetics. Which means it is a defined race?
A race can therefore be defined by the genetics of a group of people from a certain country?
So let's say that your Celtic whites put their foot down and took on the Roman Empire who believed in crucifixion? The Celtics would be a race. Why? Because it has to do with an agreed belief system within that race and genetic consistency of the race or group of people.
Paragraph "F" Now how do you factor in the dumbing down of America into all of this? Do the dumb of a race, are they really part of that race? One could say that they are indeed genetically different from the mean of the race.
So then one is tempted to ask how someone who is tormented by voices fits into their own race? I would say that in contrast to those who in the last paragraph can be genetically defined as being lesser than the race; the ones tormented represent the pinnacle of that race.
I will also assert that the issue is not solved unless it is thought of along these lines and meanings.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
And who does a billionaire consider to be a member of their own race? A billionaire considers other billionaires to be a member of their own race or ruling class, fortunate ones, special group, whatever. To them they are up and above their own real race? Because they don't give back to their own race, they give back to other billionaires instead, it can be said that they are not really loyal to their own race and hence were never really a member of it to start with in the first place. More or less a member of "F" race.
And there she was.
What does a fly taste like?
So I had just finished my toast breakfast and had a ginger cookie afterwards.
My first cup of coffee was regular. This was my second cup and it was decaf.
The ginger cookie is a lot crunchier than the toast.
I had taken my plate to the kitchen sink and resumed my spot in my living room chair to read internet news.
I took a sip of my coffee.
There must have been a cookie crumb or bread crumb on the rim of my coffee cup I thought.
But in a split second I then thought. The texture of this is different than food. It is more like a piece of sponge.
Some element of reason kicked in with me. I better get that out of my mouth and see just what it is.
I looked at my finger in astonishment. That is a G/D fly!
I had to take a picture because if I didn't no one would believe me. I would likely even doubt my own memory if I had not taken a picture with my cell phone camera.
It was only in my mouth for a split second and out of disgust my memory of what is tasted like is somehow obscured by the micro shock of the event.
And seriously, there are likely two flies in my house every year at the most.
I want to say that the flavor was a quarter the smell of lawn grass, a quarter the taste of lemongrass and the other half a dry germy taste. And highly nauseous.
Off topic. Isn't a person who has tattoos all over their body in the act of becoming a fly?
And so I will go on with the story.
It had to have been on the rim of my coffee cup and I didn't see it? Or it had to somehow be down the inside edge of the coffee cup, sipping the coffee from there and somehow entranced by it?
I mean have you ever heard of anyone catching a fly with their mouth?
And perhaps I could take on the persona of an Italian woman? "Can I make coffee? Oh, boy can I make coffee!"
So I had to ask myself, "What happens if I actually ate that fly?" I mean if I hadn't noticed the odd texture?
Per an internet search some people say nothing. However some people say that you could get salmonella poisoning from it! I am with that latter group.
So what I did to counteract that notion is this. I have some peppermint oil capsules in my house. I cut one open and took a taste of it. And flushed that peppermint oil around in my mouth with water and swallowed it. Per my memory it has just the right kind of antimicrobial effect.
End of story. Except for the photo!
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
Link to fly eating research: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=what+happens+if+you+eat+a+fly&ia=web
Anakin
Slow down the pronunciation of the word and what does it sound like? It sounds like
Any Kin
Meaning Any Family.
Meaning the character could represent a member of any family?
Meaning the character could be like a brother to you?
Drawing immediate commonality to the character.
Meaning, increased marketing proceeds?
Think of a lonely neglected boy playing video games in what amounts to a darkened closet. And his hero is Any Kin.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
1. The Wisconsin Lottery was established in Wisconsin in 1988.
2. Tommy Thompson was Governor in Wisconsin from 1987 to 2001. And it seemed like forever!
3. The Wisconsin Lottery is run by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue.
List of governors of Wisconsin - Wikipedia
So for those who feel or know that they have no upward mobility it offers hope?
Does it bother me when someone of low class becomes a millionaire? Yeah. Why? I don't it is like that will be a parent who will be drunk on beer and screaming at the soccer coach?
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Humor 08 08 2022
"I may play the wordle.
But I won't wear a girdle."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Phrase For The Day 08 08 2022
"Bluntly rude and snap happy about it!"
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
Philosophy on Academic Based Error 08 08 2022
"One antiquated definition being allowed to define another definition."
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Did you ever stop to ask yourself, "Should someone like that be wearing a suit or should they really be wearing a two piece light fabric denim uniform?"
Someone like what, you ask? Lying, deceitful, blatantly criminal.
And what about badgering, conniving, contriving and bamboozling lawyers? That behavior only supports and populates organized crime! Same thing right? Should they really be wearing a suit or should they be wearing a light fabric two piece denim uniform?
Is what this person is saying really consistent with our Democracy or is the gestalt of this individual more accurately described as, badgering, conniving, contriving, bamboozling, lying, deceitful, and blatantly criminal.
I once pressed a friend of a friend as to why they voted Republican. He couldn't give me a straight answer or even validate one platform item. But finally said, "Because he thinks like I do."
You mean like this? "badgering, conniving, contriving, bamboozling, lying, deceitful, and blatantly criminal."
Okay, I will wrap this up. Hopefully in an hour or hour and 1/2 these storm clouds will pass over today.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Ps. I am probably a lot harder hitting than I think I am.
"Hey you low life clown alcoholic, you gonna shave before you make those television commercials?"
Blitz Tackling the Christian Religion 08 08 2022
“There is only one God.” It really means that there is only one man. It is something they tell their mentally retarded children so that they don't become mortally depressed when they compare themselves to a normal intelligent child.
“God so loved his people that he gave them his only son.”
This is complete baloney. The pharisees needed an alibi to killing Christ. They tried to kill him many times. What that statement is the equivalent of is, it doesn't matter what you do to other people in your life. They are here for you to sacrifice.
“Are you the son of man?” Can you imagine walking through a city in Biblical times and a drunk comes up and asks you that? You would be dumbfounded right? “You mean you too are not a son of man?” What the h3ll is wrong with you? Are we not all sons of men? What are you the son of if not a son of man? What is wrong with you?” After which whatever that is crucifies you.
“Where did he get all these things?” So indeed Jesus Christ could cast demons out of people and at the same time the demons left the person so did the persons sickness! And do you know what the Bible also tells us? That he knew the demons!!!! And then he comes back to his home town and they all say, “Where did he get all these things?” From first demonically possessing people and making them sick? And then by healing them by driving the people who you tasked with demonically possessing them out of them? And receiving money from it? The bible doesn't phrase the “things” he brought back home as material things but rather knowledge. But I think the Bible might be covering it up.
“We are all created in Gods image.” No that isn't true! You have to have a human soul in order to be created in Gods Image. The Church does not want to tell you where exactly they believe that human soul comes from. Because they have an element of deceit going on. The legitimate human soul comes from a normal mother and father giving birth to a child out of love that is not brain defective. Contrast that to someone who is born with fetal alcohol syndrome mental retardation or Downs syndrome, whereby the hippocampus of the brain attains substantial irreversible damage due to alcohols influence on the pregnancy. The hippocampus is responsible for memory gatewaying. Why you remember what you remember. And if you can accurately remember at all. The point being is if you can't remember you are going to be clueless as to what is wrong and what is right your whole entire life. In effect you have no human soul if you can't even figure something simple like right from wrong. So no, we are not all created in Gods image. Sorry. Case closed.
And this is just off the cuff stuff. If I had more distraction free time I could do a more comprehensive job at this.
But why is the faith in Jesus Christ a valid one? If you look at it as his conflict with the ruling class. But it isn't taught that way. They would consider it self incrimination or taboo to teach it that way.
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=TAR+IN+CIGARETTES
Apparently it is created as the tobacco is burned. And the sticky tar coats the lungs and damages them.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=is+tar+added+to+cigarettes
https://www.google.com/search?q=destructive+distillation&client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=ALiCzsbEUU5SQyXJ_1hOMedUWIwhZZKuxQ%3A1659959405125&ei=bfjwYq2OB-LA9APBwr34Cw&oq=destructive+d&gs_lcp=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-aAVwAXgAgAF_iAGKC5IBAzkuNpgBAKABAcgBCMABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz
Okay I seem to remember that tar was added to cigarettes? But it forms when they are burned? But a quick google search I can't see that tar was ever added to them? Was it? Looks like some clean sweep up of the internet has been done regarding the issue??
Thomas Murphy
PS.
So what would be the effect of adding tar to cigarettes? Creating a sticky substance that coat the lungs would be the equivalent of the oxygen deprivation to the brain caused by alcohol?
Because if you have a sticky substance coating the lungs by default less oxygen is getting in the blood stream and to the brain?
So right there you have the potential for the same birth defect as fetal alcohol syndrome?
But with cigarettes you have two things going on at once? Less oxygen to the brain while at the same time the simulant effect of the nicotine?
So I just wrote that and now I am thinking about the meaning of it. How many criminals are criminals because they smoked cigarettes? Follow the logic? I have to articulate the logic for a lot of things because people can't follow this stream of conscience.
(A) The logic being you are depriving a human being of oxygen to the brain while at the same time giving them a stimulant?
It just makes me sick to think about it.
I could label it "Criminal creation."
I wonder how many people had a smoking wife they had to divorce because of (A).
Who should pay to support that god awful person? How about the tobacco companies? Perhaps the lawyers that defended them?
It would appear that they should also be chipping in for the real cost of criminals to their victims!
These same people want to label our Second Amendment as being psycho! As if they somehow know better! Someone with an oxygen deprived brain on stimulants knows better? Sickening!
You can see the gestalt of exactly that in the personality of a lot of criminals and smokers. Bluntly rude and snap happy about it! Bluntly rude because of the tar in the lungs and snap happy about it because of the nicotine!
Like I said a few weeks ago, when I was a boy I saw this behavior of smokers and never smoked because that is something I never wanted to be. Perhaps if I inform you about it, it is of some benefit?
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
What would I replace it with? Something that is accountable to the biological mother.
1. Whereby the biological mother never completely cedes ownership of that child to the adoptive family.
2. Whereby if the biological mother is poor that adoptive family must pay her support to live.
3. Whereby if that biological mother has a drug problem those who gave her the drugs get the death penalty.
4. Whereby if that biological mother has a mental illness defined by her being tormented by voices she receives twice the support as in number 2 above.
5. Whereby the adopted child retains the surname of the biological father.
In other words there isn't going to be a haves and have nots issue to who is allowed to keep a child.
And perhaps we need to change the country whereby if a mother can't afford to keep her very own child because she has to work. Well just came across a stumbling block here. Because it looks like this is leading to orphanage or foster care environment which I do not believe in.
Wait a minute back on track. Ban alcohol! And that mothers problems go away. Ban alcohol and you don't have those women loosing their inhibition to having sex with strangers and getting pregnant.
Also stipulation. A mother must be married in order to keep a birth!
In other words if you don't have that valid marriage license you cannot keep that pregnancy.
******'
So what inspired this writing? I watched part of a 60 Minutes episode last night whereby it told of how 4000 solders are killed (was it every year) just in training?
It was things like, they would be told to go for a drive in a military vehicle full of recruits in the back of it. And down the road there would be a large covered hole where the vehicle would fall into and they would all die because of percussion with the armored walls of the vehicle in the fall. Or they would be out in an amphibious vehicle and it would sink and kill them all like in a sardine can.
We are not supposed to have an army in times of peace. Can you see why?
I am just adding all this stuff up. Like how cancerous the tar that forms in cigarettes is to the lungs. And how the once richest man in the nation made his money by investing in cigarette companies. How many people have retardation because of alcohol.
And what about politicians today? Why I won't vote Republican? It is really quite simple. Because I believe in good people!
But back to illegitimacy? Who would create the conditions whereby you could die in military training like that? Only the illegitimate would do that. Illegitimate? Look like us but something is a little different with the way the brain is wired. You can't have over-site of young people in the service and create those condition like that unless... Unless you feed of the death of people in some way!!!!
There I said it. Sure it is way out there. Sure it could be used by someone to discredit and ridicule me. Sure it could be used against me by some sort of odd prude. I don't care! I had to say it! I would not be a man if I didn't say what I believed in.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
PS. You outlaw adoption and it forces many good things to happen!
And I do find it sad that he died of heart failure at the age of 61. Why? Because I think that if a person makes a substantial contribution then the longer they live the more substantial contributions they will make. And the more they will experience the benefit of knowing their substantial contributions. And the longer they will serve as a living role model.
Thomas Murphy
I believe this to be the text of the initial patent.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US2972726A/en?inventor=otis+boykin&oq=otis+boykin
Why did I research this? Because I wanted to determine which side of the resistor the inventor of the resistor defined to be positive.
By reading the patent it looks to me like he put an expansion stitch stretch joint in the wire wrapping of the resistor with this invention.
And I can't understand all the spelling mistakes whereby the f on the keyboard should have been pressed in this patent. It does make me wonder if they eventually planned to discredit this patent, and give it a lost toss, because of all of those spelling mistakes? He could not have filed the patent and made those spelling mistakes.
*****'
So resistors are said to not matter which way they are placed in an electric device? Are you trying to tel me that when they build a space shuttle or billion dollar jet plane they don't care which way that resistor is placed in the circuit board? There has to be an advantage one way or the other. And that fact resides in which is the initial layer of the wire in the resistor. And which terminal end of the resistor is from the outer layer of it. There has to be a durability element to one way or the other. Whereby if you hooked it up both ways and repetitively tested it, one way would fail greater than the other. Because of which is the initial layer and which is the outer layer.
© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy
From figure 8a of
it looks like the outer layer is the positive inflow and the inner layer the negative outflow.
And that is all the time I have for this now. So if someone where to read through that completely and more comprehensively they might find a different conclusion present.
So there was a story in the news recently where a guy went on a stabbing spree (Apple River?) and he killed one of them with the knife.
Now let's say that he gets convicted and goes to prison. After a while lets say he gets paroled. Because a lot of convicts do. But because he is a felon so he won't be able to have a gun. The only problem is he didn't kill with the gun. He killed with a knife.
So if you want to be apples to apples in the justice system you would say that he could also not have a knife in addition to not being able to have a gun.
So what is he supposed to butter his toast with in the morning?
****'
Now there was another case where a man ran over his girlfriend with a car. Went to jail. Got out. Got in a car and ran over a whole bunch of people in a parade in Waukesha WI.
So the law should be he should never be able to drive a car again, in addition to not having a gun? Everyone is going to say, "How is he supposed to get to work?" What work? Running over people with a car?
******'
Okay lets change the direction of this a little bit. A bear attacked someone. The justice system had no problem finding that bear and killing it.
So can the comparison be made that we should have no problem instituting the death penalty on people that kill the innocent? I think that is what is required to maintain justice. And the whole thing gets distorted when you have organized crime in your country. The propaganda you might see is that the death penalty is horrible. That it is inhumane. That a lot of times the wrong people were convicted of the crime and were on death row and by the luck of something evidence was found and they were released. And oh boy are we lucky as a society we didn't have the death penalty?
And what else is likely part of that propaganda motive? Because people know you have organized crime in a country perhaps the don't want the death penalty because organized crime knows they go to far sometimes? And could there be an issue where someone got made at a criminal of that nature who victimized them and killed them? The point here being is that you should not have the death penalty for someone who killed a member of organized crime? IMHO. And it is a great thing that there is a new law to the effect that if someone is being human trafficked and they kill the pimp they are not likely to be charged....and forgive me if I don't know the exact wording of that law.
*****'
What am I getting at here with this? A United States Citizen is either guilty and in jail and obviously can't have a gun in jail? Or they are free and all Constitutional Rights apply to them? Should someone be allowed to have a gun in jail? Do they not still have the right to protect themselves from violence in jail? When you have members of organized crime in jail shouldn't a nonmember of organized crime be allowed to have a gun in jail? And what am I implying with regard to the fate of organized crime?
And what did that brain surgeon Republican who ran for President say? That black men are not gay when they go into prison but when they come out they are?
Shouldn't a man have the right to protect themselves from homosexuality in prison? I always like to make a comparison. If Lot from the Bible had had a gun perhaps the city he lived in would not have been destroyed by God? And lot would not have had to flee that city, because he had a gun. To protect himself and his son when men came to his door wanting to have sex with his son.
*****'
And what else am I seeing in this great nation of ours? I am seeing an undertone of propaganda that the founding fathers were blockheads for creating that Second Amendment? That everyone in this country is a blockhead because of our Constitution today? That those who believe in every right that is written in the Constitution are somehow an antiquated blockhead?
Our Founding Fathers were not blockheads! They were highly intelligent.
Do you get the notion that some people on the television news media really hate our country? By how they characterize people, freedom and the Constitution.
And there is going to be a questionnaire on the ballot that will read about like this, "Do you believe you should have less Constitutional rights concerning...." It really doesn't matter what right it is does it.
But our Founding Fathers were not blockheads. And therefore we can say without a shadow of a doubt they didn't create the United States for blockheads?
*****'
How Americans were murdered in 2016:
| Firearms | 14,415 |
| Cutting/Piercing | 1,781 |
| Suffocation | 502 |
| Striking | 217 |
| Poisoning | 135 |
| Fire/Burning | 131 |
| Drowning | 44 |
| Motor vehicle | 27 |
| Fall | 5 |
| Other/Unspecified | 2,105 |
Table borrowed from: The Most Common Methods of Murder | American Council on Science and Health (acsh.org)
So if you want to be fair about the law a released felon who murdered by one of those means in the table would be restricted from it?
Striking? Oh the poor dear can no longer be a construction worker with a pick axe?
Drowning? Oh the judge ordered that the poor dear can longer go by any pools of water?
So lets say that someone who murders isn't as intelligent in some way. Something wrong with them, right? How can you have someone who is free like that....for example, how can you tell them not to go near water, because they are likely to drown someone again? How can you tell them not to pick up a hammer because they killed someone by striking them?
How can you say, now don't you dare get behind the wheel of a car again, because you intentionally ran people over. So you are free, but don't you do that again.
Poisoning? "We don't want you around any chemicals. So you are not allowed to have vitamins in your house because you could give someone an overdose with them? And you are not allowed to clean with bleach. And you can't have antifreeze in your car. And you are not allowed to start a fire ever again with matches or anything else because you burnt someone to death in arson."
Do you see what I am getting at? Take the word gun out of it, and you get a better idea of what the real problem is?
I think if that Second Amendment falls a lot of us will be taken out to "killing fields" somewhere and shot to death. A lot of us who are not blockheads. Shot to death for what? For the shooter having a love for blockheads?
Okay I am just starting to scratch the surface of an archetype that doesn't belong in our Democracy?
*****'
And I did indeed find it a relief that Dick Chaney came out against Donald Trump recently. Dick Cheney a former CIA person, head? And here I thought a lot of Trumps actions had to be orchestrated by the CIA as false flag events or whatever?
*****'
Indeed ,this article is just me talking aloud. Did you ever meet a prudish person who acted like everything you said or believed in was some kind of taboo? I mean; what?
What? How come you sat through all of those history classes and didn't come to conclusions like this? When you learned of our country in history class what belief system were you applying to that knowledge? How were you thinking about United States History? You would have to have a broken walnut!
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Just like a bad report card isn't caused by the card.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Three bathrooms. Male, Female and Italian Castrati.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
Instant Polymerization of Mucus and Other Membranes 08 04 2022
Yeah, maybe I'll tell you what this one is about after a while too.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
I tell you what, if I have a great day today I will tell you later.
© 2022 Thomas Murphy
