The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Monday, August 8, 2022

Who would add tar to cigarettes? Updated 08 08 2022

 https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=TAR+IN+CIGARETTES

Apparently it is created as the tobacco is burned.   And the sticky tar coats the lungs and damages them.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=is+tar+added+to+cigarettes

https://www.google.com/search?q=destructive+distillation&client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=ALiCzsbEUU5SQyXJ_1hOMedUWIwhZZKuxQ%3A1659959405125&ei=bfjwYq2OB-LA9APBwr34Cw&oq=destructive+d&gs_lcp=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-aAVwAXgAgAF_iAGKC5IBAzkuNpgBAKABAcgBCMABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz


Okay I seem to remember that tar was added to cigarettes?  But it forms when they are burned?  But a quick google search I can't see that tar was ever added to them?  Was it?  Looks like some clean sweep up of the internet has been done regarding the issue??

Thomas Murphy


PS.

So what would be the effect of adding tar to cigarettes?  Creating a sticky substance that coat the lungs would be the equivalent of the oxygen deprivation to the brain caused by alcohol?

Because if you have a sticky substance coating the lungs by default less oxygen is getting in the blood stream and to the brain?

So right there you have the potential for the same birth defect as fetal alcohol syndrome?

But with cigarettes you have two things going on  at once?  Less oxygen to the brain while at the same time the simulant effect of the nicotine?

So I just wrote that and now I am thinking about the meaning of it.  How many criminals are criminals because they smoked cigarettes?  Follow the logic?  I have to articulate the logic for a lot of things because people can't follow this stream of conscience.

(A) The logic being you are depriving a human being of oxygen to the brain while at the same time giving them a stimulant?

It just makes me sick to think about it.

I could label it "Criminal creation."

I wonder how many people had a smoking wife they had to divorce because of  (A).

Who should pay to support that god awful person?  How about the tobacco companies?  Perhaps the lawyers that defended them?

It would appear that they should also be chipping in for the real cost of criminals to their victims!

These same people want to label our Second Amendment as being psycho!  As if they somehow know better!   Someone with an oxygen deprived brain on stimulants knows better?  Sickening!

You can see the gestalt of exactly that in the personality of a lot of criminals and smokers.  Bluntly rude and snap happy about it!  Bluntly rude because of the tar in the lungs and snap happy about it because of the nicotine!

Like I said a few weeks ago, when I was a boy I saw this behavior of smokers and never smoked because that is something I never wanted to be.  Perhaps if I inform you about it, it is of some benefit?

© 2022 Thomas Paul Murphy


No comments:

Post a Comment