The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

Jet Engine Efficiency 04 04 2018

Jet Engine Efficiency 04 04 2018

So I was running some publicly available numbers on the B2 Bomber.  The conclusion I came up with is that it is a very large gas tank that flies sideways.

But it brings up the question again.  What if you superheated jet engine fuel before you "injected" into the jet engine?  To a temperature of just pre-explosive?  Would you not have a more efficient jet engine? So the search term would be:  pre heating jet fuel.  So that it isn't a spray vapor injection but a gas valve escaping injection?


https://www.google.com/search?q=pre+heating+jet+fuel&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab

A little bit of humor here?  They say that the background checks to pilot this thing are extremely stringent and thorough?  Why?  Because if the pilot knew what they were sitting in the middle of no one would ever want to go up in one?

*****'

But what really makes it stealthy?  It has to do with the radar signature return of it?  Radar is designed to be able to detect planes because the are long from nose to tail.  In effect it is a short nose to tail plane.  It has to do with velocity and nose to tail distance?  In effect it gets lost on radar quicker because by the time the next radar signal is hitting it the plane has "traveled past" its nose to tail distance in comparison to a standard ratio plane?  For radar to be able to see it the radar would need to be much stronger and require more energy input into it?  To the point of being dangerous in some way?

*****'
But maybe there is a "coefficient" that makes preheating it in the above manner not make sense?  In which case the aviation fuel needs to be reconfigured perhaps with an additive?  Which would make the idea unfeasible because military logistics would likely screw that up.

 © 2018 Thomas Murphy

Now one of two things.  Lets say either I want to catch a Chinese version of this plane en-route or I am a pilot not wanting to be seen.  What am I going to be doing?  I am going to want to know where the radar stations are.  To do that I am going to be monitoring radar signals via whatever means.  Likely initially remote.  Then what?  You guessed.  I am going to be piloting that gas tank at a 180 degree angle to those radar signals!!!  I am going to be flying sideways!  And when am I going to be doing that?  At night.  So that all the sand people can't see me plain as day.

*****'
Which brings up another issue.  Fuel Pressure and Dynamic Fuel Weight distribution during flight?

******'
But ever watch the movie Spinal Tap?  Perhaps detecting one of these is just as simple as turning up that gain and signal frequency.  But then again it absorbs it.  So how are the Russians able to detect it?  (It has been stated that they can!) Via heat signature.  And how?  Radar doesn't bounce off different densities of air?  Or perhaps that is just it.  A completely redesigned radar that doesn't look for our B2 at all but measures the different air densities.  Very interesting.  And the Russians are indeed stated to have a lot of research on weather.

So indeed lets say that I cool my exhaust in some way.  Then what are the Russians going to look for?  A vacuum bubble moving in the sky?

In effect in order to detect a Chinese Version of this coming at my homeland I would need a radar type system that can measure differences in air pressure moving fast.  But that pressure difference is all happening on the top of the wing.  So it is less detectable.  Hmmm.

In effect there must be a air pressure "Deharmonic" on the front and rear edges of the wing.  So that is what I would focus on detecting.

So indeed in my patriotic version of the plane I would need a phase shift emitting device to cancel out that de-harmonic signature.

******'

So why won't there be WW3 in a traditional sense?  It has something to do with what Jesus Christ said.  "A house divided against itself cannot stand."
 

******'

Just some rough calc numbers.










Range 6900 miles
















2228505 litres Equals 58870 gallons














Range miles 9000 mils















Airbus A340-500







https://www.aerospace-technology.com/features/feature-the-longest-range-airliners-in-the-world/
















45133.6666666667 Would need 45133 gallons















45000 gallons would be
6015 cubic feet
6015 Cube root of that is 18 feet by 18 feet by 18 feet











45000 kilograms of fuel at a time= 99,208 pounds







Aviation fuel weighs 6.01 pounds per gallon







16507.1547420965







16507 gallons
6900 miles divided by 16507 gallons







It gets 4 tenths of a mile per gallon























Wingspan = 172 feet









34.9709302326 5.91 5.91 1221.4681482558











86 one wing length 3007.5 cubic feet








A one wing length B Max Wing Height C




3007.5= 86 2 C




3007.5=








172




Wing depth
17.4854651163





17.5 feet





























No comments:

Post a Comment