Marriage Compatiblity 06 07 2015

Marriage Compatibility 06 07 2015

I don't believe that you should marry are person unless you could be that person. What do I mean by be that person? Just say that could you be that soul, regardless of sex?

Would you like yourself if you were that person?

Now knowing that would you marry someone that doesn't even like themselves?

How can you expect to be someone else if they don't even like themselves?

How can you expect to be compatible with someone that doesn't like themselves?

So perhaps I am wrong and one of the persons strengths helps the other as man and woman and vice versa.

And it looks like there could be two sides to this issue that could be equally valid? So how can I disprove one over the other?

Let's try this. Are you really marrying that other person because you want others to validate you as each individually happy people?

What is important to know is the reason for marrying and the high divorce rate!

Let's say two people that absolutely hated themselves married? One would tend to think that would be a high divorce rate? But what if they were allowed to own slaves? They would take all that hatred out on those slaves while at the same time finding their personal happiness from the money the slaves earned FOR them. What I am getting at is, does a marriage need a scapegoat in order to survive? Now lets say we took away a scapegoat? Would that marriage still be a mairrage?

Should it make you happy in marriage just because society validates you as a pair in a wedding ceremony? No. There are couples that never officially got married but stayed together until death did them part; happy that whole time? So the issue here again is internal happiness versus external happiness? Internal happiness being that the couple love each other and themselves.

To accept that other person you first have to accept yourself. How can you tell someone that doesn't accept themselves? What kind of behavior do they act out? What do they attempt to prove? Do they attempt to prove to you that their happiness is based on external factors? External factors being more of an indicator of heathenization?

So a pair of homosexuals gets married (two men or two women) is that happiness really externally based that is delusionally internalized?

Perhaps I missed the point I was attempting to make. So I will go far out on you again. Lets say that both a man and a woman both have the same cognition as another human being labeled schizophrenic in medical fraud. Should that ever be a basis for marriage? I think that should be a contraindication for a couple becoming married. In other words, what they have in common really has nothing to do with each other! It is an external factor. It isn't really the same thing as sharing common interests because that doesn't reach the complexity of the issue. It is more like this. Lets say that a man and a woman both liked abusing the same slave? There now I am getting at the issue! Each of those persons should never be allowed to marry anyone!

Don't care if you want to label this paranoid fantasy and all that other mean stuff. History will indeed prove me right; I am that confident.

Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 06 07 2015 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com

Now one more bonus topic, how much of a better place would this world be if losers were not able to forget about their problems via the self administration of a cancerous poison; alcohol? Now that would create a world of responsible men and women wouldn't it! That would put conscience and reason back where it is needed. That would take the power away from the wasteful, polluting and controlling.

*****'

One more point. Lets say that you are a punch drunk idiot that somehow got caught up in the Holy Spirit of another person. Is it that other persons fault? No! In fact they want you gone out of there like the plague! So what do you do? You don't bother that person! Instead you go find your !biological father and ask him why he had you as a son! You ask him that! You don't have the courage to do so do you! Coward!

 

I can continue writing this cr@p until the day I die!

 

 

With regard to the Holy Spirit.

Song lyrics from "The Velvet Underground" "Little Joe never once gave it away, everybody had to pay and pay."  That isn't true!  The truth is that when Little Joe gives it away he pays very dearly!  Which means one of two things. 1. They absolutely loath your Holy Spirit because it means Delusion of Self Gone Now!  or 2. They see that it is out there and drain the life of it and you like it is a free all you can eat place.

 

But lets get back to marriage.  If 50% of marriages end it divorce it really means that half of the people who got married never should have got married!  So how can you lobby for homosexual marriage when 50% of those who are heterosexual should have never got married?  It is kind of like this.  We are going to analyze this issue from a structural standpoint.  We are going to take all the factors into the issue that need to be made before making an educated decision.  Isn't that something that is lacking in American Government today?  I used to blame Scott Walker's bad decisions on alcohol but he doesn't even drink!  Go figure?  Maybe his mother did during conception or while pregnant or his father did before conception?  Odds are fairly high that his fathers sperm might have been a little oxygen deprived from serving wine at mass as a Baptist Minister?  I assume they serve it at mass?  How many masses did he serve a week?  And the minister has to drink it doesn't he as part of the ceremony!!!!  Now there is no better reason that any religious authority consuming alcohol to NEVER be allowed to marry a woman or conceive than that!  Did they know something like that when they set up the celibacy structure for the original Catholic Church?  That seems like the best reason in the world for it!  Some little man sitting in the Vatican library can figure that one out.  If he hasn't already figured out that alcohol is the perfect way to ruin democracies.

These are the beliefs of Thomas Paul Murphy