LUKE 16:26 01 09 2013
I believe that the reason some of us suffer from different forms of mental illness is because it is not about us but rather about those on the other side of the chasm from Lazarus.
"between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.' (Luke 16:26).
What else that is interesting about that this story of the Bible tells us is that there is something that the rich man could not stand and it had to do with Lazarus being risen from the dead. What is implied here?
Why would you or I or anyone care or feel the effect if someone was risen from the dead? But the point being that it is the rich man who was somehow burdened by Lazarus being risen from the dead. From my memory of the passage it continues with the rich man saying things like, "This is not so good! This is awful!" We don't know what is so awful do we? So what are we to assume? There is only one thing you can assume from this passage, The rich man had stolen the soul of Lazarus!!!!
And whether Lazarus was really dead or if it was a metaphor for Lazarus being doped is a question I ask. Was Lazarus poisoned by the rich man like men and women are put on psychiatric medicine today???? They did indeed know of poisons back then. Roman women knew of poisons to get men interested in them. And Egyptians had their poisons too. If not indeed they did not seek to give people candida brain infection from alcohol!
So you feel that you are harassed by those who should have no reason to harass you? Just remember what Abraham said about the rich man versus Lazarus; it was over for the rich man and he was getting it back. But wait a minute Lazarus died in Abraham's arms...So in the world I interpret the satanic to live in did that mean that Abraham then had Lazarus's soul? And hence he took the position of Lazarus as he died or to facilitate his death?
We will just assume that Abraham meant what he said in good nature in terms of the fate of the rich man and we will indeed use it in that belief to give ourselves hope and understanding that those who make us suffer are indeed on the other side of that great chasm and they are stuck and can complain all they want and it will do them no good, you can complain all you want about a problem you caused and it will do you know good, and the fact that you are bothering me means that it is not so good for you. And your mode is indeed to make it no good for me, so you are indeed making the problem worse and worse for yourself and also in the process you are indicating that it is not good for you to do so, but you don't stop!!!
There is a certain amount of finality in terms of the wicked here isn't there?
"between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.' (Luke 16:26).
It is like one of the very few problems that I can not take the other side of the perspective on. It is one perspective I cannot comprehend. I don't have a solution because I cannot comprehend it. I cannot comprehend why you would seek to live in this manner or solve problems in this manner. It terms of my understanding of you it is like there is indeed a great chasm fixed. I don't see how any problems can be solved by those who have created a bad reality for themselves and seek to solve it by creating a bad reality for other people. If your obsession is indeed to create a bad reality for other people how can you be said to be a problem solver, intelligent, pragmatic??? You know as well as I do that it is the minds that are the truly loving and caring minds that create all the good in the world and not those of people who would seek to create a bad reality for others. That rich man lived in hell because he never formed his own soul or was required to in life.
The Bible is indeed implying that the rich man destroyed the life of Lazarus and that is what brought him happiness and wealth. But when Lazarus came back from the "dead" the rich man faced a reality of someone that saw all that someone else did in envy and could not break out of seeing through the eyes of Lazarus?
Which leads me to the next question. I don't know the exact number of football fields that could fit in that Temple in Israel that the Romans destroyed. But I believe from my memory that the number was close to 30. The walls around it were lined with gold! That gold had to have been mined by someone. The Bible does tell us that they had slaves.
The next question that I have to ask is, "Where those that mined the gold given some kind of dope that made them zombies?" If so what were they given Belladonna, low dose Hemlock? Just enough to work them to provide gold for you and have them die after the productive process was over?
And indeed was this what Lazarus was? It makes you want to cry doesn't it!
May the modern archetypes of Lazarus live happily and to a ripe old age!!!!!
Copyright 2013 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 01 09 2013 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
PS. I also wonder if the British did not try and dope the Tea that caused the Revolutionary War. It is a very ironic that your modern Tea Party makes its money off of the Financial and Insurance Industries- and Health Insurance is indeed the corrupt one! Somehow they got their hooks in us.
PPS. I am going to switch back to the "Abraham Bad" mode and read literally between the lines. If Lazarus was a slave then Abraham came chasing after him? Lazarus escaped over a great deep valley that separated the slave mines from the home of the rich man, (Assuming that the rich man being symbolically referred to and Abraham are not one in the same.) And hence Abraham is apologetic to the rich man? In the manner of this slave fled from my property and it will not happen again? This interpretation seems to fall into the puzzle better. Even though I like the other one better.
PPPS
Believe it or not those who talk to you in your head and you hear voices from are indeed one with your body. I don't know how or why other than some kind of immaculately conceived type of soul thing. But if you hear voices and ever want to prove this, go get a message! Then just walk around and see how happy every seems to be!! And it might not even be fair to say that it is those who talk to you in your head that are happy; there might be another faction in this that is on your side of thinking counter to the distractors- that becomes happy; maybe they both do; who knows.
But assuming the immaculate soul theory and soul theft theory applies to all this; the issue I believe becomes one with the fate of the rich man. If the rich man was born with an immaculately conceived soul then he would be part of the soul of the, for lack of a better term "Donor" The way the natural progression should have played out would be that he would be of the starter soul for awhile in his life and eventually be forced by some type of reality life event to start thinking independently for himself. To most of us normal people that happens by the time we reach kindergarten or grade school. I believe it never happens to the satanic; and they are stuck in that dream world. Wasn't it beautiful your early years in life; who could blame you. So what is the reality that this archetype would face later in life? It would be very hard for them to be their own true selves. They would always be that which seeks to listen to the thoughts of another in life? What am I getting at? A religion that would seek to track down that starter soul and seek to beat it until it was less than human? A religion that would seek to maintain connections to starter souls? Most people would believe that everyone has their own soul, you know they are their unique personalities. But if that race of people sought to maintain a connection to the starter soul and indeed defeat it so that it could feel like it was indeed the source of the starter soul- that would indeed be soul theft, and that would indeed be the nature of the rich man in this story from the Bible. And the Bible does indeed more support this point of view because their was indeed some qualm the rich man had with Lazarus, "This is not so good, this is awful!" And I do not believe that he was looking at a tattered escaped slave.
But you know what? Both of my interpretations are likely true at the very same time because they both have true meaning.
So maybe the rich man is freed by exposing him for what he is, and at the same time Lazarus lives on because the truth is known and no longer resented; no shame in the truth.
I believe that the reason some of us suffer from different forms of mental illness is because it is not about us but rather about those on the other side of the chasm from Lazarus.
"between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.' (Luke 16:26).
What else that is interesting about that this story of the Bible tells us is that there is something that the rich man could not stand and it had to do with Lazarus being risen from the dead. What is implied here?
Why would you or I or anyone care or feel the effect if someone was risen from the dead? But the point being that it is the rich man who was somehow burdened by Lazarus being risen from the dead. From my memory of the passage it continues with the rich man saying things like, "This is not so good! This is awful!" We don't know what is so awful do we? So what are we to assume? There is only one thing you can assume from this passage, The rich man had stolen the soul of Lazarus!!!!
And whether Lazarus was really dead or if it was a metaphor for Lazarus being doped is a question I ask. Was Lazarus poisoned by the rich man like men and women are put on psychiatric medicine today???? They did indeed know of poisons back then. Roman women knew of poisons to get men interested in them. And Egyptians had their poisons too. If not indeed they did not seek to give people candida brain infection from alcohol!
So you feel that you are harassed by those who should have no reason to harass you? Just remember what Abraham said about the rich man versus Lazarus; it was over for the rich man and he was getting it back. But wait a minute Lazarus died in Abraham's arms...So in the world I interpret the satanic to live in did that mean that Abraham then had Lazarus's soul? And hence he took the position of Lazarus as he died or to facilitate his death?
We will just assume that Abraham meant what he said in good nature in terms of the fate of the rich man and we will indeed use it in that belief to give ourselves hope and understanding that those who make us suffer are indeed on the other side of that great chasm and they are stuck and can complain all they want and it will do them no good, you can complain all you want about a problem you caused and it will do you know good, and the fact that you are bothering me means that it is not so good for you. And your mode is indeed to make it no good for me, so you are indeed making the problem worse and worse for yourself and also in the process you are indicating that it is not good for you to do so, but you don't stop!!!
There is a certain amount of finality in terms of the wicked here isn't there?
"between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.' (Luke 16:26).
It is like one of the very few problems that I can not take the other side of the perspective on. It is one perspective I cannot comprehend. I don't have a solution because I cannot comprehend it. I cannot comprehend why you would seek to live in this manner or solve problems in this manner. It terms of my understanding of you it is like there is indeed a great chasm fixed. I don't see how any problems can be solved by those who have created a bad reality for themselves and seek to solve it by creating a bad reality for other people. If your obsession is indeed to create a bad reality for other people how can you be said to be a problem solver, intelligent, pragmatic??? You know as well as I do that it is the minds that are the truly loving and caring minds that create all the good in the world and not those of people who would seek to create a bad reality for others. That rich man lived in hell because he never formed his own soul or was required to in life.
The Bible is indeed implying that the rich man destroyed the life of Lazarus and that is what brought him happiness and wealth. But when Lazarus came back from the "dead" the rich man faced a reality of someone that saw all that someone else did in envy and could not break out of seeing through the eyes of Lazarus?
Which leads me to the next question. I don't know the exact number of football fields that could fit in that Temple in Israel that the Romans destroyed. But I believe from my memory that the number was close to 30. The walls around it were lined with gold! That gold had to have been mined by someone. The Bible does tell us that they had slaves.
The next question that I have to ask is, "Where those that mined the gold given some kind of dope that made them zombies?" If so what were they given Belladonna, low dose Hemlock? Just enough to work them to provide gold for you and have them die after the productive process was over?
And indeed was this what Lazarus was? It makes you want to cry doesn't it!
May the modern archetypes of Lazarus live happily and to a ripe old age!!!!!
Copyright 2013 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 01 09 2013 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
PS. I also wonder if the British did not try and dope the Tea that caused the Revolutionary War. It is a very ironic that your modern Tea Party makes its money off of the Financial and Insurance Industries- and Health Insurance is indeed the corrupt one! Somehow they got their hooks in us.
PPS. I am going to switch back to the "Abraham Bad" mode and read literally between the lines. If Lazarus was a slave then Abraham came chasing after him? Lazarus escaped over a great deep valley that separated the slave mines from the home of the rich man, (Assuming that the rich man being symbolically referred to and Abraham are not one in the same.) And hence Abraham is apologetic to the rich man? In the manner of this slave fled from my property and it will not happen again? This interpretation seems to fall into the puzzle better. Even though I like the other one better.
PPPS
Believe it or not those who talk to you in your head and you hear voices from are indeed one with your body. I don't know how or why other than some kind of immaculately conceived type of soul thing. But if you hear voices and ever want to prove this, go get a message! Then just walk around and see how happy every seems to be!! And it might not even be fair to say that it is those who talk to you in your head that are happy; there might be another faction in this that is on your side of thinking counter to the distractors- that becomes happy; maybe they both do; who knows.
But assuming the immaculate soul theory and soul theft theory applies to all this; the issue I believe becomes one with the fate of the rich man. If the rich man was born with an immaculately conceived soul then he would be part of the soul of the, for lack of a better term "Donor" The way the natural progression should have played out would be that he would be of the starter soul for awhile in his life and eventually be forced by some type of reality life event to start thinking independently for himself. To most of us normal people that happens by the time we reach kindergarten or grade school. I believe it never happens to the satanic; and they are stuck in that dream world. Wasn't it beautiful your early years in life; who could blame you. So what is the reality that this archetype would face later in life? It would be very hard for them to be their own true selves. They would always be that which seeks to listen to the thoughts of another in life? What am I getting at? A religion that would seek to track down that starter soul and seek to beat it until it was less than human? A religion that would seek to maintain connections to starter souls? Most people would believe that everyone has their own soul, you know they are their unique personalities. But if that race of people sought to maintain a connection to the starter soul and indeed defeat it so that it could feel like it was indeed the source of the starter soul- that would indeed be soul theft, and that would indeed be the nature of the rich man in this story from the Bible. And the Bible does indeed more support this point of view because their was indeed some qualm the rich man had with Lazarus, "This is not so good, this is awful!" And I do not believe that he was looking at a tattered escaped slave.
But you know what? Both of my interpretations are likely true at the very same time because they both have true meaning.
So maybe the rich man is freed by exposing him for what he is, and at the same time Lazarus lives on because the truth is known and no longer resented; no shame in the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment