Observation of legal precedents beings created in the court system that egregiously do not comply with the spirit of the United States Constitution 08 26 2013

Observation of legal precedents beings created in the court system that egregiously do not comply with the spirit of the United States Constitution 08 26 2013

Introduction: this is about how defense lawyers confuse witnesses, it is close to “leading the witness or jury but not quite.”  I don’t believe that there is a name for it.

Attempted obstruction of knowledge based on defying logical premises a more educated person might have.  That essentially amounts to a litany of legal precedents based on mood.  And what is mood?  It is resentment?  Resentment of the educated or those capable of being educated?  It basically creates a society of the, “Don’t want it to truists.” (A)

So an Objection a prosecuting attorney might say to a judge in such a case would be,

“Objection, A legal defense that panders to the weak will of the uneducated and uneducatable.”  The basis of the form of ‘Objection’ being it sways a panders to a jury of not what should be our piers.  And hence it creates a society of potential jury members who are not what should be our piers.

So with the indoctrination into society of those who are not of our piers as the majority… who can we blame for it? Those who used the legal tactic and hence the determination is that they should not be our piers?  Meaning...what legal remedy???

Follows directly from (A)=>  Isn’t that really denial of shame?  ~ non-recognition of human rights being an abuse of freedom?

And what legal precedent does that create that might motivate the less educated to become criminals or criminal minded?

It validates the lower tier of society until all of society becomes lower tier?  That would seem to be the trend it creates?

Copyright 2013 Thomas Paul Murphy

Originally published on 08 26 2013 at:  www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com