A paper publishes an article linking statins to causing diabetes and then the article was removed 05 21 2014
Where they paid to remove it?
Is that a source of income in Journalism today? Write the truth and then expect to be paid to remove it by those who have a monetary interest in that the truth not be known?
And the article did not go far enough in terms of what remedies society has in terms of eliminating medical fraud.
And shouldn't there be a Government function that defines law in Journalism just so that a paper can not retract the truth in the interest of money and power connections?
I don't believe that I have ever retracted anything I have written at "The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News"
Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 05 21 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
Where they paid to remove it?
Is that a source of income in Journalism today? Write the truth and then expect to be paid to remove it by those who have a monetary interest in that the truth not be known?
And the article did not go far enough in terms of what remedies society has in terms of eliminating medical fraud.
And shouldn't there be a Government function that defines law in Journalism just so that a paper can not retract the truth in the interest of money and power connections?
I don't believe that I have ever retracted anything I have written at "The Milwaukee and Wisconsin News"
Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 05 21 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment