How the Bill of Rights Should Really be Worked Over and Amended 11 13 2015
Who is supposed to be the feet of the man who has no legs? It is one thing to suggest that "someone" should be the feet of the man with no legs and quite another to actually be tasked with being the feet for the man who has no legs! Now this is indeed Conservatism at its best. Who is it that is actually the feet of the men who have no legs in our Democracy today? It is those in poverty? The ...poor are the feet of the rich that no longer have legs. Is that type of distribution in conformity with our Constitution? No. What would the founding fathers say if they knew wealthy family after wealthy family were drinking a poison that caused their children to be born mentally retarded? Would they have volunteered to be their "feet" in life? Quite to the contrary they stated that if you don't work you don't eat. So the man with no legs would not eat. And nor are any of us to be his feet for him. And with regard to those who hear voices. Are you supposed to be the minds of the mentally defective? In metaphor that means you are to be their "feet" too! No you are not! They wheel a man up to your shoreline and he has no mind and no feet. Who among us in the land of the free is tasked with being his mind and feet? That is enslavement of those who have their own minds and feet and that is illegal. And sure you obfuscate the issue by presuming that you are the purse strings and hence you have enough money; but in reality if you were to pay for it you would no longer be wealthy hence the poor are the minds and feet of the wealthy who have neither minds nor feet.
Republicans who erroneously all themselves Conservatives who parade their tail feather in everyone's face and claim to be the party for families with Down's Syndrome people in them really would not like what true Conservatism means!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 11 13 2015 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment