If an accused criminal intimidates a Witness then the standards of burden of proof should change? 11 15 2015
In effect one could say that that threatening of a witness proves the case against you?
This needs to be articulated with contraindications to its use.
But that would have to be one of the most dangerous criminals there is. Doesn't that threat ultimately equate to the death of you in some way? For example they might threaten that you will never work in this town again. Doesn't that really mean death from exposure in homelessness? Is that really organized crime asserting and conducted non superficial genocide?
******'
And here is what I absolutely hate. One member from each from two different races shake hands and establish organized crime in a country. Then one of the races establishes laws where you can be sued out of house and home for saying something bad about them. In effect for stating they are part of a criminal organization? That violates the constitution moreso than any other infraction.
Am I talking about the Purple Gang and the anti defamation league? The assassination of John F. Kennedy and the Italian Mafia? Yes!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 11 15 2015 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
In effect one could say that that threatening of a witness proves the case against you?
This needs to be articulated with contraindications to its use.
But that would have to be one of the most dangerous criminals there is. Doesn't that threat ultimately equate to the death of you in some way? For example they might threaten that you will never work in this town again. Doesn't that really mean death from exposure in homelessness? Is that really organized crime asserting and conducted non superficial genocide?
******'
And here is what I absolutely hate. One member from each from two different races shake hands and establish organized crime in a country. Then one of the races establishes laws where you can be sued out of house and home for saying something bad about them. In effect for stating they are part of a criminal organization? That violates the constitution moreso than any other infraction.
Am I talking about the Purple Gang and the anti defamation league? The assassination of John F. Kennedy and the Italian Mafia? Yes!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 11 15 2015 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment