The United States Constitution and Religion 04 24 2014
The United States Constitution is very clear on religion!
Amendment 1. “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
Everyone wants to make you confused over the interpretation
of that and they have indeed been successful in doing so! To correctly interpret it you have to realize
that when the founding fathers fled The Kings Religion of England they said it
was the equivalent to the Jews escaping from Egypt! They never wanted anyone to ever have to go
through that kind of abuse ever again!
Hence we are not allowed to write laws that are “RESPECTING AN
ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION.”
Here is the definition of respect.
Respect means to hold in high esteem! To admire!
The Constitution was written by those who had one of the
greatest commands of the English language in history!
The opposite of RESPECT is disrespect! Because of the spirit of that law the
implication is that we may indeed write laws that disrespect an establishment
of religion? No but most of those laws
that we would want to write with regard to that are already written in terms of
our criminal law! With regard to the
sexual molestation of children by the Catholic Church. We can’t write laws that say that is okay to
do because that is respecting religion!
And when you have that much abuse it is indeed part of religion! Even one count of it would have been too
much!
Now it gets fuzzy here with what an establishment of
religion is versus what isn’t. Can you
establish a religion that violates human rights? I suppose you can but each and everyone who
did so is still criminally liable for their actions! There is no kings shield available as a
religion! In effect limited liability as
in a Corporation is a Kings shield and a violation of the Constitution as it
respects religion! So limited liability is
unconstitutional! Most of us human
beings have known that all our lives!
Because the Government gave religion a charitable tax break
they have indeed made a law that respects the establishment of religion! AND THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO DO THAT PER OUR
CONSTITUTION!
Religion is a personal and spiritual concept, it has to do
with personal beliefs. Personal beliefs
ultimately boil down to whether you believe in yourself or not. “The
free exercise thereof” means that you are free to believe whatever you
want! If you want to believe you are
like Jesus Christ and should be no one should have ever been able to create a
medical document saying you are mentally ill because of it like the DSM 3 did? It also means that you should never have to
pay a cost for your beliefs; because it is free!
I believe that the Constitution states that we may not make
a law that respects religion! It doesn't
say that we can't make laws that disrespect religion!
For example if there were a religion that believed in
drinking alcohol while a woman was pregnant or during conception in order to
create babies with impaired hippocampus function we could indeed weigh in
heavily on that. As without a healthy
hippo campus a person is not defined as a human being because they do not have
the learning and memory capacity that creates both human conscience and human reason. So in effect that religion would be one that
was not creating beings that are compatible to live with regard to the rights
of others in the United States!
Also psychiatry is the exact equivalent of the Vondoon
religion of zombifying human beings!
Therefore non one can ever be force medicated because it would be
creating a law that respects religion!
We cannot create laws that respect religion!
Like it or not the Pro-Life movement is indeed a form of
religion and hence Congress can make no law respecting the pro life
movement! And not only that, just
because that baby in the womb has a beating heart does not mean it will be born
a human being! Like it or not again, a
human being is defined to have human reason and a human conscience (its OWN)
per the United Nations Universal Bill of Human Rights!
It is very interesting that every single aspect of you
Constitution has been challenged and defeated in some manner, but the one
regarding religion has not even once been correctly interpreted!
And what happens when a criminal justice system fails to
prosecute 43 cases of child pornography (as I read in the Milwaukee Journal) because
they believe that human beings should be able to watch it and produce it? It means that our Criminal justice system has
been completely corrupted! It means we
have judges of poor character in place, if not the term devil!
I am absolutely amazed at how our constitution has been
subverted and broken by the ink from the tip of snakes tongues!
Making a drug that violates the right of a human being to be
free from addiction (liberty) is also a violation of the fact that laws cannot
be made that respect religion! Addictive
drugs are their own religion! They are
of the spirit and a bad one! One might
make the contradiction between a holy spirit of a human beings soul and an unholy
spirit of a drug user! We can’t make
laws that make them legal, even though we did in 1932, but we can make laws
that prevent you from becoming addicted because it violates your right to
Liberty! Liberty meaning freedom and
those who are addicted have indeed lost their freedom because they cannot stop
doing something. Now you and I see that
and say he/she could stop anytime they wanted?
That is not what addiction means!
Their right to that freedom, the freedom to be normal, the freedom to conceive
normal children has indeed been taken from them!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 04 24 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
Legal background, Was an equity research analyst, passed the
CPA exam the first time that I took it in 1991 and often debated with my father
who attended Marquette Law School. A man
once told me that the rich people who live on Pine Lake Waukesha County
Wisconsin have a saying and it is this, “That is the mind to beat.”
And with regard to churches. Do religions actually need them? No they can peacefully assemble in public places if they wish. There is nothing that states we are to have to pay a sales tax to create giant churches for them! Also wasn't a Roman Colosseum really like a horrific church? Look what went on in them! I think of that as I look at the player from the Pittsburgh Pirates baseball team who has a 1" cut under his left eye from being hit by a Milwaukee Brewer! We paid a sales tax to have that facility constructed. And to watch chosen sons on steroids make millions of dollars from playing a game and gashing other players eyes? That reads more like a religion to me than a public service project!
Surveillance and illegal search and seizure are also religious concepts! And they are creepy ones! Hence the Constitution banned them! For that very reason! They are actions that respect a creeps re legion! However that didn't stop mad man George Bush or Barrack Obama from saying they are necessary!
Most of our Criminal legal code DISRESPECTS the rights of Religion that the actions of those involved in religion are undertaking! And we have to do that in order to ensure our freedom! Do you understand what it means now? No one wants to see an aboriginal American scalping others and claiming its his religion! No one wants to see an aboriginal cannibal eating human brains in the United States and claiming his is protected by the Constitution and religion! It doesn't work that way!
If you agree with me on some of this please sign any and all of my petitions:
Here are the links to the current ones.
The relevant ones here are the death penalty for dealers of addictive drugs and child molesters and nationalization of all church assets. Some might agree that religions are businesses. However then they cannot be religion! There can be no business in belief systems that violate personal beliefs or ones belief in themself? And what happens when one parishioners father does not pay as much as the wealthy business mans to the school church? The poor child becomes abused as the pagan sacrifice doesn't he! Because it is a business and not a religion!
If criminal conduct occurred and there was a group effort to hide that on church premises can the Government take those buildings and land via eminent domain? ABSOLUTELY! The rule is what are you the equivalent of? Are you the equivalent of Organized Crime? If yes then we don't want you here in the United States!
If criminal conduct occurred and there was a group effort to hide that on church premises can the Government take those buildings and land via eminent domain? ABSOLUTELY! The rule is what are you the equivalent of? Are you the equivalent of Organized Crime? If yes then we don't want you here in the United States!
Here is the link to the links of my current petitions!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 04 24 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
No comments:
Post a Comment