Why Property Taxes are Unconstitutional 09 13 2014
The Founding Fathers would have viewed
Corporations as Profit Centers. If you read the Constitution that is
what Senators are supposed to amount to; and the profit to be for the
benefit of the people (common wealth) and not a miniature monarchy
concept.
Per the United States Constitution
Taxation is to be Uniform! (Article one Section 8-1.) Which can
only mean that the Spirit of the Commonwealth law that taxation
continued until all men of the country made the same amount of money.
And they would not have considered some people men at all; such as
those who were hung in Salem Witch trials for poisoning people or
molesting boys (the desire to touch another mans genitalia being
designated as gay behavior).
Also Taxation was only done in order
for the Public Good! Hence property tax which might make a person
lose their property (primary home) (commonly believed to fund
education) would not be considered legal because losing ones home
does not benefit that benefit the general health and welfare
Constitutional provision required by taxation, And the Founding
Fathers had the biggest problem ever with illegal search and seizure
of their property! Put that into perspective when you see a bank
President making a Billion Dollars a year while he is a profit
participant to the interest rate home mortgages are based on being
fraudulently manipulated. The Founding Father went to War for no
less than that and executed those who felt differently as in the
Revolutionary War and the Civil War! To you see how the
Unconstitutional property tax supports an entire financial industry
(labeled themselves Tea Party; a national shame) through churning
profits by manipulating (yes it happens; a fact) interest rates?
A Senator was to be a profit center
that benefited the people! Corporations would not have existed
because they defy Uniform Taxation and do not benefit the General
Health and Welfare of the people and are therefore Unconstitutional!
A good point to ask the question for
further research as to, “What were the Euthanasia laws and
principles in colonial America?”
Back to property taxes. The Founding
Fathers hated the principle of polygamy and therefore the concepts of
pro-life and bastards put up for adoption! They believed in drinking
only in moderation because they wanted everyone to be born with the
capacity to read and not have a mental birth defect related to
alcohol. So you would not have seen the post tavern night one night
stand pregnancy babies put up for adoption! And why also would they
not like polygamy? Because it amounts to one man having an unequal
amount of children. Off topic: That medicine man secretly siring
bastards in the teepee might have been the basis for our Conflict
with the Native Americans. Why? The brain defect from
interbreeding.
Again they would have loathed the
concept of children being born unable to read and learn, why?
Because they wanted everyone to be smart enough to obey laws; on
their own! Without that it degrades to the subjective rule of
dictatorship! And we have a lot of that going on today with high
ranking judges unable to accurately interpret the Constitution and
the Spirit for which it was created; in a phrase “Human Reason!”
Smart enough to obey laws on your own; that is the standard of
EQUALITY we must be of!
So how did they euthanize those not
born to that standard? Did they stone them to death; as might be
alluded to in a story I believe was titled “The lottery” which
per my decade's old memory might have been written by William
Faulkner? They would not have drawn straws in order to determine who
to stone. And nor would they have victimized those who were smarter
than the rest; they were to rise to the top as is the symbolism on
the Dollar Bill the Pyramid with the “all seeing”- meaning eye of
knowledge!
With equality as assumption is made
that your cost to be educated in the economy is the same; but because
taxation is mandated to be Uniform it means those who cost more to be
educated should pay more! Some of us even contribute greatly to the
education of others by being in the same class as them and living in
the same community with them!
If someone worked for your company and
became disabled then your true cost to our economy is much higher
than the rest; therefore Uniform Taxation based on the standards of
Equality means you are not equal because you don't meet those
standards; hence under the provision of Uniform Taxation because you
are not equal you should pay more! Equality only works when you are
able to meet the standard of being equal! No one DISABLED your
child, they were born unequal! So what does the provision of
Equality imply; if not elimination of the unequal? The Constitution
was not created to grant special privileges to the unequal!!!! The
Constitution was created so that all normal born human beings were
considered equal and would obey the rights! It is they who were to
form the top echelon of American Society!
The spirit of the Constitution is that
they would have never wanted those who are unequal to rising to power
to jeopardize the rights of the normal; as occurs in a monarchy!
Whereby the leadership hated, loathed and resented the people because
they were better than the leadership!
A man is born mentally unequal does that mean that he should be unfairly compensated more for playing a game game his entire life? The implication is that the mentally unequal have risen to the level of insurgency? What would the founding fathers say about those born mentally unequal disabling those who were born mentally equal (normal?) Again they were for fairness and would have viewed a movement like that as an insurgency or a great threat to our Democracy and Commonwealth!
Part II
A wealth tax would be a better way to
fund the school system than a property tax. Five thousand dollars a
year for a family who has one child in a class of 20? It would never
cost that much to educate me! You would not have to pay a teacher
$100,000.00 a year to do it! So maybe we need segregation based on
mental aptitude. And does not the child with a behavior problem cost
more to educate? And do they not detract from the education from the
other children? Now lets compare that single child family to a
family that has 10 children. A ten child family would have to pay,
say 6000 dollars a year because they had a little bigger home. That
amounts to a cost of $600 a year to educate each child! We already
know it costs more to educate a child from a family like that! So
that is not uniform as required by the Constitution! And isn't a
family adopting more children really a form of tax evasion? (Now it
would be an entirely different issue if there had been Prohibition up
to this day and age; because you would not have children being born
with mental retardation as alcohol is the leading cause of in the
Western Hemisphere. But what of parents who chose to drink and have
children like that? They chose to create children that are unequal!
And you can not argue that a person with some form of mental
retardation is not unequal! And the argument that they have at least
one good skill is highly invalid; because it does not compare to the
cost to society of that skill being attained; if the skill even
exists. Skills don't work that way do they! The best skills are by
those who have transitional learning; which means they can learn many
skills throughout their lifetimes and as they age they grow and
develop more from the ones they first learned! So the concept of one
skill is invalid! The scene of a man coveting pound of someone elses
flesh seems to apply.
Just as a matter of circumstantial
evidence I can remember at least two families in my gradeschool class
where the third child born was mentally retarded; and in both cases
the parents were drinkers! It costs exponentially more to ATTEMPT to
educate that child!!!
Property tax is Unconstitutional
because when you cannot pay you lose your property (primary home) and
that does not the general health and welfare of you an American
Citizen as taxation is required to by the Constitution! Article
One Section Eight dash One!
Now at this point I might make an
example of a College room mate that I had who was a Republican; he
didn't make it through to graduate. But here is the important crux
which is represented by the Republican Party; his parents were
wealthy, he had dyslexia and also hated the Constitutional provision
of WELFARE!!! Anyone else get the great contradiction there?
The United States Bank Fraud against
the Citizens was bad enough; when they lost their homes! The You
shouldn't have to pay property tax and lose your home because you
can't pay; in order to educate those birth defective children caused
by alcohol, drugs, filth and poor choices that cost our democracy
more!
It is like a trap that preserves that
wealth class isn't it! You pay a lot more than your fair share in
equality to educate their children many of whom can't be truly
educated because of a brain birth defect caused by alcohol while they
wait for you to lose your home because you pay that much! After
about 20 years of that they go on to live wealthy lives from the same
constructs of unfairness and you look like the one who couldn't be
educated and learn because you lost your house because you had to pay
to educate those children! That is why a wealth tax addresses the
issue more fairly! Wealth being defined as the total value of
assets and money less liability. And to make the proper legislation
consistent with the Constitution; in the case of falsely stating
liability and understating assets it would be defined as racketeering
whereby all assets are forfeited!
And what of the RESIDENT CITIZEN that
has no children? In some cases they should be paid, that's right,
PAID for living in your community!
Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 09 13 2014 at:
www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
The first two pages take ten minutes to
type and the third takes an hour because the voices start to Donkey
their way into it.
One could also declare that high property taxes have led to a squatting layer of incompetence in local Government!
No comments:
Post a Comment