Reproductive Rights 10 25 2014

Reproductive Rights 10 25 2014

It is listed on the White House .gov website as an issue so I am going to comment on it!

Text missing here.....

Look at how much the son of a woman hates anything that is true! Why would you want someone like that to reproduce? Only if you hated male intelligence. You talk to some and they are not on the same wavelength. They can't comprehend simple things your father taught you!

The Jews in Israel understand this issue full well. They claim that God said that people are going to be their slaves but only if they want them as slaves! God told them that.

Gay marriage rights.

With all the fuss they are causing I am wondering if they would not be emotionally happier people if they were sterilized? Which brings up another question, “How does sex/reproduction drive establish itself in a gay person? What do it mean in that case? What are the implications?” Is it so bad that they would have normal human beings take antipsychotic medicine that completely ruined their sex drive?

But on women versus men. As I was growing up I quickly realized that in some things my mother was more level headed and therefore smarter than my father. I was at a concert once where a lesbian stated she liked her male roommate better than her female lover because he was more responsible around the house! Now I am touching on an issue I have yet to articulate fully; but I believe that some women never get a true image of what a man is supposed to be and act like as they are growing up!!! And this segue's me into the next part.

I bet if you made a video of a gay man just talking about his opinions on men, life and the physical world and showed it to a lesbian and gave her an easy questionnaire on it. But then asked her a slip in question that you really wanted to know the answer to for the whole thing, “Would you like to have that mans child?” Assuming it is a Lesbian that wants to be artificially inseminated, and assuming the homosexual was the ugly one with the likely curl in the back of his tongue that gives him a buzzhole voice, the one that they keep showing on the local news getting married, I bet that lesbian would quickly answer no or hit the gong button.

Now this leads me to my next logical conclusion.

I believe that the lesbian envies the thinking of “real” men more than anything else on earth. And by real men I am not talking about a lantern jaw Burt Reynolds type, but rather those with non defective hippocampus's that can think for themselves!

Which brings up a new philosophical proverb, “Envy implies desire! And therefore there is danger in the motive!”

Now not all lesbians are nice. Some are so wicked that it defies human reason. So they do indeed like the image of the feminized man because it levels there sense of self empowerment above that of men. And I touched on the issue of not have a good (non-defective hippo campus) father figure in the home as a reason for this above.


If you were to eliminate the me who can't think for themselves and therefore their actions are no longer happening in the world, would there be a single lesbian? I just look at Draconian crooked tooth Cheney and him being part of torture and then think of him having a lesbian daughter; and wonder what his genetic profile is.

The question becomes will those who believe in Gay marriage take the idea to the extreme that it will amount to acts of aggression and sterility against those who are not gay?

You see this issue weighs heavily on my human conscience in just the opposite way as it did when I was younger! I don't see how you let someone without their own mind reproduce. I believe that those women who do not have their own mind should be paired with those who do, currently that is the schizophrenic whose mind is dunned by voices therefore indicating a high demand for his human thinking. And what about the men who cannot think for themselves. To me they should not be able to reproduce and pass on that drone feature that causes aggression to the real image of man; that with a human conscience and human reason. The social reforms of FDR's new deal program were indeed based on Nazi American eugenics and the belief that the larger man, the Goliath would prevail in times of hardship! Just the opposite is true, the Goliath is indeed creating times of hardship through negligence! He has no vision for the future of humanity because he can't even think for himself. The Goliath and his pygmied version have infested corporate management and polluted the world in a 2 for me and none for you doctrine. That dolt that can't think for himself can't teach. More to the point he doesn't want to even learn! He is lost in a dream world whereby the apex of achievement is to play a childhood game for a living! I do not believe that non-schizophrenic males; meaning those defined to be dependent minded via brain scans and other means should be able to reproduce! That which cannot think for itself is not a you-man, it is an animal among humans! And that makes the trend de-evolution. Is there evidence that this might be a different species among us? Yes there is evidence of a genetic flaw in the gene that regulates serotonin and therefore the reward mechanism for achievements and also sexual desires. Now to put the exclamation point on the topic one of the drugs that is used to treat those who hear voices causes men to grow breasts. So it has happened already and drastic reforms are going to be needed to correct this problem in our world!

And I am well aware of where my articulate falls through the cracks, because when it fails to transform into writing is indeed when an odd auditory noise is disturbing my thinking! But my words still remain true even though you are not able to read the complete synthesis of them because some beast doesn't want it articulated. You are allowed freedom to think because you are allowed freedom of speech; therefore it is unconstitutional to medicate a single human being with (for great profit) psychiatric drugs!

Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 10 25 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com


Bonus topic. Why lesbians should be against marriage equality.  It makes the white heterosexual couple less competitive!  And new young women are only produced by the heterosexual couple.  Now if lesbians like the look of beautiful women as I do they would never want a heterosexual white couple to have less competitive advantage by giving greater rights to a homo couple; why?  It means less beautiful young women are created in traditional families.  And less candidates for them to desire?  There are not as many pretty women today as their used to be!  It is like the Magog listed above have taken them under false pretense of being responsible me who could think for themselves!

I always believed that if I were to have had children they would be better than average looking and good people that made a positive contribution to society.  Not two for me none for you takers who pollute the world with toxins and banana peals.