I often feel that some of us who are diagnosed feel guilty ourselves because we cursed someone and a coven or group of whatever that is is cursing us in an odd justice? Don't get hung up on that concept and here is why. Because they are cursing you later in life it means that they never liked anything about you, they never liked your thinking whatsoever, or they never developed their own ability to think for themselves! That same person or group of people that is cursing you later in life it means that they are still inciting evil! It means that they for some reason were always inciting you to be angry at them and curse them! I call that process inverse imprinting and believe that it is a sign of a mentally defective person or group of people for two reasons. 1. It is indicative of their inability to think for themselves. 2. It is criminally minded behavior whose goal is to violate the thinking and ability to think of men. 3. It is a mean thing to do for no reason! And perhaps there reason is that they never had their own conscious mind it was based on reactive thinking to yours? The truly criminally minded person is a very mean person, and that is a sign of a mental defect. In fact there is no greater sign than that!
The point here is that person you cursed is going to use active denial systems to create voices and prevent you from using your own higher mind capability in life! Not only were you initially justified in cursing them; they never belonged living in a civilization! They incited it initially and will be bad to the bone their whole life! You did nothing wrong if it was incited. In fact when it is incited it is because they want to hear your anger. They feed upon it! And yes that is a blood sucker! One race less than the human species! Aha I like that! “One race less than the human species!”
Now lets assume that you are a psychiatrist on the ward of a criminally insane ward. The only people who will save you from getting beat to death are other patients that have been diagnosed as psychotic. It means that they have had a break from reality for some reason as justification for their horrible crime and therefore they do not serve time in a regular prison! Okay what all of these laws and our current judicial code has never addressed is, what incited that person to commit the crime? You watch a bull in a rodeo pen and he has a rope tied around his hind quarters constricting his penis in pain and he is being electric shocked. Do you ever ask yourself why is that bull trying to kill the rider on its back? No you don't! What is the human breaking point? What type of human being would incite someone to reach that point? I believe that if some criminals could articulate how they were incited to violence and we could walk in their shoes we might not find them guilty. But in a court of law it is something different. The lawyers and the judge are very clear on the issue aren't they!! It doesn't matter why they did it all that matters if you believe they did it. Our Founding Fathers knew very well how evil people incite others to criminal behavior! That is why they put it in there that inciting Civil Unrest is an Impeachable Offense. However that Inciting a crime never works its way into our general legal code and it should! It should follow directly from that Constitutional provision! Lets say you have an older brother or stepfather that is raping you every day and you kill them? I don't see how any human being can rationally say that you should serve time for that! In fact my personal opinion is that the defendant in that case is a great hero! No one has ever said anything like that or been of that opinion before. But that is how I think. Now lets say that a bunch of mentally defective people find a way to electronically harass a human being to make them here electronically generated voices that cause pain in their heads. That is real technology and the effects are real. I could tinker around in my basement and easily make something like that, but I wouldn't! But that is real technology so how can you prove it wasn't used against a person to incite them to commit acts of violence? It has not been recognized but it should, and particularly where people hear voices and then commit crimes. It is completely negligent of our Democracy to let this snake slither by and among us like this!
The criminal mind thinks this way, “It feels good to get away with something because it never faced valid patriarchal accountability!” In that essence it is a very spoiled person! So who is that? Someone of a child of family money, someone who is of the organized crime mindset and also someone that was born mentally defective!
So lets say a man is a psychiatrist in a criminally insane ward. Lets say a person born mentally defective is killing them and lets say another patient who was made insane via the use of nonlethal weaponry (again I could make something like that! I haven't and wouldn't.) You as a psychiatrist are making a great deal of money treating these people but one of them saved your life! They didn't have to! Also the money grubbers who own or fund the place were not going to put you in a position where you would be safe. Do you question their sanity and mental state? They put money ahead of the public good and human life didn't they! But you don't have the authority to release that person. And can you really release them if indeed that coven who drove them insane is out there some where and their fur ears perk up upon hearing that person think again and they go after them again? And that person commits another crime because of it? But again that person saved your life! They didn't have to do so! They did not have to put themselves in harms way! You see that they know right from wrong which means they are not psychotic even though that is what they are imprisoned for.
But lets say that you are that lead psychiatrist and a man that you diagnosed as having a break from reality psychotic saved your very own life! We are getting at the boy who cried wolf scenario here. But off topic, can you imagine what the fate of the human race would be if there were those among who took credit for the intellectual property of those that they were dependent minded to? Sooner or later it reaches a point whereby they are the only ones left and all that there is are problems they created through lack of giving credit where credit is due, and their inability to find solutions to those problems because they never truly had that ability. In effect you have a situation where the person stated they knew everything and that was their own horrific undoing! Now if you have ever watched a yuppie arguing with his father as they attempt to fix a sliding screen door you get some sense of how wealthy people are truly incompetent. And that is another topic about how a man should learn and develop to be a man through a series of common real world learning steps, rather than just graduating from college not being able to type and getting an investment banking job controlling capital allocation!
But here is that last point I was building up to.
Now every time I am about to make a very good point an humming noise that is vocally attenuated beams straight at my head and that point is immediately erased from my memory. So these articles tend to get wordy and worded down! So again who is it that is jealous of my verbal intellect? The Bible calls them, “The miserable ones that are still with us!” In the future we are going to have to be very vigilant so that they are aborted upon the first sign of mental defect such as sexual molestation of children, bullying, inability to learn. That is where the worlds conflict comes from and it isn't normal; that isn't natural! It is spoiled, resentful and willful!
A very interesting question I will ask on this board is, “What types of people make you jealous.” Some of us don't get jealous instead we attempt to achieve to the best of our means. But the voices that talk to us against our will would seem to be highly jealous of us. Let's see the 2000 year question is why? That is what the whole issue centers around and how it is unraveled!
Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
And here is another crux of the issue, If the jury is adjudicating, why is the Judge doing the sentencing!!!! It doesn't really make sense! The judge reverses what they Jury believed? Or would a Jury be more truthful if they were also doing the sentencing? Now what if a jury disagreed with a judge on sentencing because of incite or motivation for the crime as stated above? In a modern justice system whose sentencing then should take precedent? If you want to say the judge I would state that it has likely been corrupt already otherwise crime would not have festered to the level it has! If you want to say the jury then you get a racially motivated jury projecting their own lesser standards and self pity on the defendant. But what about a wealth status quo motivated judge doing the sentencing? Can't be anything worse than that! So the Jury should get an initial shake at sentencing! And the judge then sentences and the jury judges the judges sentencing. For a jury to convict me I am entitled to a jury of my piers! Can you find me a jury of members that also hear voices and know without a doubt that those voices are not themselves cursing themselves? I dare you to attempt to create juries based on that concept as the founders of this country had. Find me a jury that will state these God awful leeches are "draining my life substance from me," paraphrased as what was written in the Declaration of Independence! My the United States be the land of freedom and all those who are at a mental conflict with that seek citizenship in other countries! That is the way the world should be! If you are dependent minded, or mentally defective, or criminal minded you do not belong in the United States! This is NOT the melting pot for you and you are not supposed to be here!
Scott Walker buzzholes the Wisconsin public, "Get a job." Does he ever say, develop yourself so that you can market your products as a business? No! He is a patsy for the wealth status and they are going to put him in as President to bring the world to an end! What else can he do? The first thing that happens when he is elected Governor is all they do is talk about him being President. So what will the first thing they talk about if he becomes President, should the United States have aspirations of world conquest and imperialism? And then the seven trumpets blow in the Book of Revelation and the nuclear missiles are launched and 3/4 of the worlds population dies just like the Jehovah's witnesses that come to your door tell you! I tell them the exact same thing every time, "The last time you came here I told you never to come here again!" Scott doesn't say make sure to graduate from College like I didn't so that you can be assured you have the credentials to enter the workforce. No he states get a job. Receiving $10 million in political donations he is one of the greatest entitlement beneficiaries that there is! Getting that much money in gifts of money that are allowable for some unfathomable reason he ought to just keep his mouth shut for four years and never come out of his hole!