On Judgment 03 14 2014

On Judgment 03 14 2014

Okay Freedom from Mental Slavery posted this as a banner and I responded with the following philosophical observations.  And very well they could post the same thing next time and I might respond with what might seem a contraction to what I wrote here!

Commentary on this:

“Don’t judge people.  You never know what kind of battle they are fighting.”

Thomas Murphy If they are fighting you then in defense of yourself you do judge them! For if you cannot judge them then you no longer exist? Can you not judge someone for harming innocent people? We allow judges to judge, so that means we have to have judgment ability in order to have judges! Or at least that is how it is assumed to be?

So I believe the conclusion is very different than what is implied! We do not know what kind of battle they are fighting? Should we not judge a person who fights us rather than their own battle? Can we not judge a person that refuses to fight themselves as weak? Very good topic! And cannot we not judge those who would use a pagan scapegoat behind a religious facade? Freedom from Mental Slavery..... you might have just showed you are part of the problem of mental slavery? Rather than judge them we are to be their victims and scapegoats!!! That is the nature of modern religion that you have fought quite a bit here!

And here is another one, instead of "Judge not lest you be judged," The more accurate aphorism would be, "Judge lest you not be victimized!" Or "Judge lest you not be victimized by what you failed to judge!" In other words don't let the criminal off the hook lest you be the next victim!

Thomas Murphy The argument in the picture above pre-assumes that the person being judged is being judged guilty! Sometimes people are judged innocent! And when that happens then we look for the real criminals. So from the standpoint of that argument is tit for tat! If you judge me guilty I will judge you guilty of something! And how do we assume that you know that we are guilty of something? But you assume when you say it that you know that you will be judged guilty! That statement above comes from the mind of a woman or the watching primate that would defend its own ill nature? But more to the point of the issue is the reason we assume we are guilty in judgment? Wait a minute here is the defect in thought! The person above who made that statement knows he/she is guilty and want's you to believe you are guilty too! But you by comparison have a rational mind and a human conscience and know that you are not guilty! But in effect the author wants you to be guilty for having a rational mind and human conscience? Don't judge me because I have the same mind as you? Doesn't hold water does it! For the reason 2 sentences ago; in definition! This one picks a part a great difference doesn't it! Perhaps the Bible states it best, (paraphrased from memory) "There is a wide chasm between you and them that can never be crossed" The gestalt of that statement in the picture is that the one who said it is frustrated with being human! And that is a sign of mental defect; of helplessness! So that is not really their fault or is it? That would be the center of the debate! Has to do with trying? Because they are frustrated with being human they pose the threat of assuming power and being the one to cast judgment upon those who see they are guilty! More of a gestalt here! The person who believes that above believes that the might rule! And as we are unraveling their psyche we see that the cause of that belief would be that they were ruled by the might; meaning barbaric! The person above view of justice is therefore that to learn right from wrong is a matter of dominance rather than human conscience and human reason! Okay I am glad you posted that! Because it allowed me to consider the other side of the issue! You can see at least three instances where I did not judge the persons actions as being their fault! But if they did something bad they did indeed create a victim and hence should be judged guilty? So how I look at all of this is that we need to remove those things that make people mentally defective in our society! First and foremost is alcohol! And alcohol is unconstitutional! I have gone into that logic theorem before so by this point someone else can post it! And what if indeed the judge is crooked? Some are! Do you know the judge is crooked? And perhaps the best that we have to offer in terms of judges is not good enough! Again relates to the cause of mental defect above. Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy

Thomas Murphy For example, a monkey has me in a cage, he is beating a drum outside that cage all day long. I am freed from the cage and incoherent and judged mentally ill! The monkey had no right to neither put me in the cage nor judge me! The monkey is guilty!

Thomas Paul Murphy

Originally published on 03 14 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com

Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy