Right to Work 03 03 2015
I read that some of these laws originated from the right of a United States Citizen to be able to choose what they do for a living.
This should also mean that there are few barriers of money and networking one should have to cross in order to be considered a political candidate with your name on the ballet?
Instead of not having to pay a fee to be on the ballet as is the equivalent of a Union Fee, it should cost you nothing to be on the ballet.
Also should an Individual Inventor Ever have to pay a fee to the United States Government for patenting his invention which could result in better productivity and a higher standard of living. Should a Corporation, which is by default illegal granting of the title of nobility, even be allowed to file a patent?
Right to work? You shouldn't have to pay too much to work should you.
Right to work laws also can be construed that You have the right to work using your skills and not someone else's! That you have the right to not have the use of your mind actively denied from you by organized/networked crime.
Somehow from my life experience I relate Unions to the equivalent of Communism? You have the right to work all you want in Communism don't you; you don't need a Union to protect your right to work. But you won't be working in fairness. So it is fairness that is the key.
I also believe that temporary help firms should go out of existence. Essentially you are paying your chunk of the salary to someone else that isn't doing the work. That isn't fair to the worker is it. And sometimes your chunk of what you should be making is going to a woman who is supporting a child who has mental retardation. So in effect they figured out how to get the normal human being with the gene for creative genius to support their mentally retarded children; who will never meaningfully and responsibly work.
Two or more real men really don't have a problem working with each other. And when the work becomes more than the time allotted they are hopeful to hire on another real man.
Equality with women in the workforce is a complete fraud. Perhaps the best example, if I were true you would see woman football players. Those Government docs say "All men are created equal." And men are not defined in it to be some Pollack's homosexual son. One man who walks around with his pants hanging off his butt in order to be available to any man that wants him is not a man to me! And you can't tell me that the people who wrote our Constitution and gave us our Independence saw it any other way than that. I recently read research that stated they found a defective serotonin regulation gene in homosexual mice. I am willing to bet that all homosexual men as well as the English Royal Family all have the exact same defective serotonin regulation gene. Look at the chimp teeth and the chimp like ears. That defective serotonin regulation gene is the most regressive human species genetic trait that there ever was! Very dangerous. Based on that logic construct and Iran's policy on homosexuality which is a direct contrast to Israel's, Iran isn't the greatest threat to world security Israel is. I am not saying this to be mean; it is my belief based on reason.
Speaking of which, lets say that you as a straight male had to compete for a job in Washington with a homosexual who wears his blue jean trousers so his butt crack is showing, wait a minute it wouldn't be that way because they all wear suits. Bear in mind that policy making Washington has one of the highest income bracket suburbs. Lets say you were in the Investment business and had to compete with Homosexuals wearing suits like that were the pants come down in the back so that they are granted favors? Is that the basis of our Financial System, the Federal Reserve, the Tea Party in the United States? I object to competing with those who have regression traits. None of us should ever hear baboon voices either! Can you put two and two together?
Could I build a productive manufacturing business with those who wear their trousers so that they can receive favoritism? Absolutely not. And it is like the title to the article that I read the other day, something about who can stand to talk to Benjamin Netanyahu.
Also I don't see how you could ever expect a teacher or other children to have to put up with a child with mental retardation in the same class. It is beyond human patience. Should such a child mysteriously be allowed to emerge from the wood pile of home schooling or obscure private schooling to become a competitive threat in the workplace using non man like tactics? No!
I wanted to make mention of the short sale in the housing market. Essentially you bought a house you couldn't afford and you are selling it below mortgage value, and you are having the original lending bank agree to the loss and to write it off? That is organized crime! Did you ever hear of anyone prosecuted for it specifically? No, but you will sure see on the news when the queers run a story about the Sheriff coming to evict someone and them not cooperating? And those same queers sure like to run stories about homeless people who lost their homes or employment to corruption financial people being shot to death. Do you see the gleam in their eyes as they broadcast a story like that? It means queer to me!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 03 03 2015 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
The proud Polish father who doesn't want to admit his son got to where he is in Washington by openly dropping his pants for every less than zero homosexual with money and power.
I read that some of these laws originated from the right of a United States Citizen to be able to choose what they do for a living.
This should also mean that there are few barriers of money and networking one should have to cross in order to be considered a political candidate with your name on the ballet?
Instead of not having to pay a fee to be on the ballet as is the equivalent of a Union Fee, it should cost you nothing to be on the ballet.
Also should an Individual Inventor Ever have to pay a fee to the United States Government for patenting his invention which could result in better productivity and a higher standard of living. Should a Corporation, which is by default illegal granting of the title of nobility, even be allowed to file a patent?
Right to work? You shouldn't have to pay too much to work should you.
Right to work laws also can be construed that You have the right to work using your skills and not someone else's! That you have the right to not have the use of your mind actively denied from you by organized/networked crime.
Somehow from my life experience I relate Unions to the equivalent of Communism? You have the right to work all you want in Communism don't you; you don't need a Union to protect your right to work. But you won't be working in fairness. So it is fairness that is the key.
I also believe that temporary help firms should go out of existence. Essentially you are paying your chunk of the salary to someone else that isn't doing the work. That isn't fair to the worker is it. And sometimes your chunk of what you should be making is going to a woman who is supporting a child who has mental retardation. So in effect they figured out how to get the normal human being with the gene for creative genius to support their mentally retarded children; who will never meaningfully and responsibly work.
Two or more real men really don't have a problem working with each other. And when the work becomes more than the time allotted they are hopeful to hire on another real man.
Equality with women in the workforce is a complete fraud. Perhaps the best example, if I were true you would see woman football players. Those Government docs say "All men are created equal." And men are not defined in it to be some Pollack's homosexual son. One man who walks around with his pants hanging off his butt in order to be available to any man that wants him is not a man to me! And you can't tell me that the people who wrote our Constitution and gave us our Independence saw it any other way than that. I recently read research that stated they found a defective serotonin regulation gene in homosexual mice. I am willing to bet that all homosexual men as well as the English Royal Family all have the exact same defective serotonin regulation gene. Look at the chimp teeth and the chimp like ears. That defective serotonin regulation gene is the most regressive human species genetic trait that there ever was! Very dangerous. Based on that logic construct and Iran's policy on homosexuality which is a direct contrast to Israel's, Iran isn't the greatest threat to world security Israel is. I am not saying this to be mean; it is my belief based on reason.
Speaking of which, lets say that you as a straight male had to compete for a job in Washington with a homosexual who wears his blue jean trousers so his butt crack is showing, wait a minute it wouldn't be that way because they all wear suits. Bear in mind that policy making Washington has one of the highest income bracket suburbs. Lets say you were in the Investment business and had to compete with Homosexuals wearing suits like that were the pants come down in the back so that they are granted favors? Is that the basis of our Financial System, the Federal Reserve, the Tea Party in the United States? I object to competing with those who have regression traits. None of us should ever hear baboon voices either! Can you put two and two together?
Could I build a productive manufacturing business with those who wear their trousers so that they can receive favoritism? Absolutely not. And it is like the title to the article that I read the other day, something about who can stand to talk to Benjamin Netanyahu.
Also I don't see how you could ever expect a teacher or other children to have to put up with a child with mental retardation in the same class. It is beyond human patience. Should such a child mysteriously be allowed to emerge from the wood pile of home schooling or obscure private schooling to become a competitive threat in the workplace using non man like tactics? No!
I wanted to make mention of the short sale in the housing market. Essentially you bought a house you couldn't afford and you are selling it below mortgage value, and you are having the original lending bank agree to the loss and to write it off? That is organized crime! Did you ever hear of anyone prosecuted for it specifically? No, but you will sure see on the news when the queers run a story about the Sheriff coming to evict someone and them not cooperating? And those same queers sure like to run stories about homeless people who lost their homes or employment to corruption financial people being shot to death. Do you see the gleam in their eyes as they broadcast a story like that? It means queer to me!
Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 03 03 2015 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
The proud Polish father who doesn't want to admit his son got to where he is in Washington by openly dropping his pants for every less than zero homosexual with money and power.
No comments:
Post a Comment