The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

A Psychiatric Diagnoses that was never created 10 08 2013

A Psychiatric Diagnoses that was never created 10 08 2013

Both she and he (son & husband who is just like her) are jealous because they are not MEN!  We already know it is more prevalent that Pea Soup!  Yet we deny the existence of it!

It is a great source of Conflict.  The woman will pipe up right away and say it is the same thing as Penis envy!  That is not true!  It is envy of the Minds of Men!  There is a great difference!  And if you want to get genital about it.  The ability to raise a son is the job of his father a MAN!  And what do we know?  Men with smaller testicles are better about raising children.

You can think of this species as if it is a pack of wolfs that all thinks the same.  And when the females lick themselves they are self conscious because they see that they have something missing in comparison to the males!  Otherwise there is no difference in that they both participate in pack kills.  But the highlight of the female wolfs life is when she realizes that she is the one empowered to give birth to the pups!  That her something missing wasn't really at all?  It is a source of pride!  But not always right?  Sometimes she views the fact that she had something in there where their was nothing in comparison as a burden.

The mind of what the Bible termed satanic is indeed one mind that is reactive to the pack leader and actions and thereby thought patterns imprinted.  It has little difference in knowledge between a male identity of self and female identity of self.  It thinks more in terms of dominance and submissiveness.

Where do these wolf analogies come from?  On public television there was a man, looked to be of India Indian nationality, that stated we have discovered that humans are really descended from wolves!

Is there an analogy to racism against MEN in the Bible.  What do you think the term "Son of man" was all about?  It was used in a derogatory sense!  To say it means that you are not?  And if you are not what are you?  It reminds me a lot of how and uneducated blue collar worker that I worked for while going to college talked to me sometimes, "College boy," the short Italian man would say to me in bitter resentment.  I can hear those from the ancient history of the Bible using the term "Son of man" with the same bitter tone and resentment!

If a wolf were to look at itself in the mirror it would not see a man!  Which leads to the personal defense when someone is staring at you in bitter resentment of, "Can't look in the mirror and see a man?"

Which gets me to the next point, what role did law enforcement such as the police force and not the FBI play in preventing the collapse of Prohibition?  Is it much the same problem we see today with drugs that create people you cannot trust running rampant?    Is is a matter of sympathy that drug users and Prohibition criminals were not brought to justice?  What is my point?  We have a lot of problems that have caught up with us in the United States that relate to low intelligence.

And here indeed is the last jibe, "You do not seem to mind paying the levy to the beer barons.  In fact that is one levy that you enjoy paying!"  And that levy is greater than your comprehension.

When you hear something like the phrase, "Son of man."  It just seems odd doesn't it?  So indeed you search to see what context it fits with and therefore why it was said.  Son of God would in turn be the son of a father with money who extorted  also drank?


Copyright 2013 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 10 08 2013 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com

Another interesting point with regard to perception of who should become a police officer.  I can remember when I was a boy I concluded that the biggest and meanest and therefore toughest people would make the best police officers!  But that is just the exact opposite how young people should view the police force.  We do not want people who learn to get away with abusing the rights of other children in our police force, we want just the opposite ~ those who have the common sense and ability to discern right from wrong.  If it were that way we would not have degradation of society issues!  Nor would there be any code of complacency!  And indeed Prohibition might still be in effect?  Nor do we want young men of that integrity joining the police force and becoming disillusioned by those of the other archetype and weeded out!

Life is not stressful to men when they can truthfully justify their own actions to themselves in terms of what amounted to courage and what did not.  "I know why I made that decision and I stand with it."  That is far different than, "You read what it said in the book, now this is the way we really do things here, you pi$$@nt!"  The latter degrades integrity!  And personal conduct should not be compared to what is normal on your mothers favorite soap opera.

No comments:

Post a Comment